Staff Reports
The White House is standing firm in their support of Adeel Abdullah Mangi, President Joe Biden’s pick for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, despite backlash over his ties to an anti-Israel organization. Republicans are raising concerns about Mangi’s past involvement with the Rutgers Law School’s Center for Security, Race and Rights, accusing the organization of promoting antisemitism and extremism. They argue that his association with such a group raises questions about his judgment and suitability for the judicial position.
REPORT: Biden White House Defends Judicial Nominee Questioned Over Previous Affiliation With Anti-Israel Org via @katesrichardson https://t.co/d9nbUW5wlm
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) March 6, 2024
Critics have pointed to the Center’s controversial statements blaming Israel for terrorist attacks and minimizing the significance of events like September 11. They argue that Mangi’s involvement with an organization that spreads such views is troubling and disqualifying. It’s not about his Muslim faith, as the White House claims, but about his judgment and associations.
Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell has been vocal in his opposition to Mangi’s nomination, highlighting the organization’s history of promoting anti-Semitic and terrorist sympathizing views. The concerns raised by McConnell and other Republicans are valid and deserve serious consideration in the confirmation process.
While some organizations like the AFL-CIO and Coalition of the Underrepresented Law Enforcement Associations may support Mangi’s nomination, the concerns raised by Republican senators cannot be easily dismissed. It is crucial to thoroughly vet judicial nominees to ensure they uphold the values and principles of the judiciary, free from any biases or extremist views.
In the face of the controversy surrounding Mangi’s nomination, it is essential for the Senate to conduct a thorough examination of his background and affiliations. The White House’s insistence on pushing through his confirmation without addressing these concerns is irresponsible and goes against the need for transparency and accountability in the judicial nomination process. Let’s hope the Senate takes a principled stand in vetting nominees like Mangi to uphold the integrity of our judicial system.
