Staff Reports
In a whirlwind of confusion and contradictory statements, Joe Biden’s health has once again become a focal point of concern, this time thanks to comments from Frank Biden, the President’s brother. For months, the Biden administration steadfastly maintained that the President was in tip-top shape—just a bit older, perhaps, but essentially fine. However, with Frank’s latest remark, the facade appears to be cracking, and the American public is left wondering if they’ve been duped.
Frank Biden recently let slip that he was “selfishly glad” to have his brother back for “whatever time we have left,” leaving many to scratch their heads and question what precisely that means. It is almost as if he’s subtly acknowledging an underlying concern regarding Joe’s health, which has supposedly been perfectly stable, according to the White House narrative. The absence of a clear explanation invites speculation. After all, is this merely a candid remark about Joe being 81, or is it an ominous pointer towards something much graver that the Biden family is keeping under wraps?
🚨 Biden's brother, Frank, says Biden's declining health "absolutely" played a "considerable role" in his decision to drop out of the presidential race — something the Biden administration has consistently denied.
THIS IS THE COVERUP OF THE CENTURY. pic.twitter.com/hKR3mspJp2
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 22, 2024
Adding to this twist of events, Frank openly confirmed that Joe’s health played a “considerable role” in his decision-making process, particularly regarding his campaign. If health concerns had any bearing on Joe’s choices, one has to wonder: why has the administration been so adamant about his well-being? Is this yet another chapter in the ongoing saga of misrepresentation that seems typical of this presidency?
Moreover, the absurdity escalates with reports that a family source has claimed Frank himself has been grappling with alcoholism and has allegedly not been in contact with Joe for quite some time. This latest revelation raises eyebrows and follows the age-old truth: where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Indeed, one cannot help but question the reliability of those surrounding the President, especially when they’re caught in a whirlwind of mixed messages and personal issues.
The situation presents a clear picture of a disjointed narrative. The American public has so far been inundated with reassurances about Biden’s vitality, yet the very people closest to him cast a shadow of doubt over those assertions. In light of Frank’s admission, it becomes clearer that skepticism towards Biden and his circle is not just warranted but necessary. After all, with whispers of secrets and health concerns circulating, a discerning public must insist on transparency—not the airy affirmations of health that keep getting undermined.
