Staff Reports
In a recent debate, Kamala Harris claimed that President Trump would sign a national abortion ban if re-elected. However, Trump clarified that he does not support an abortion ban and believes states should decide on the issue. Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz, have a history of supporting abortion with no restrictions, even in the third trimester.
Harris and Walz have been involved in supporting bills like the Women’s Health Protection Act, which aimed to ban any restrictions on abortions unless there was a risk to the woman’s health. Both Harris and Walz have sponsored or co-sponsored versions of this bill over the years. Harris, in particular, has been vocal about her support for reproductive choice and criticized the defeat of such bills.
Additionally, both Harris and Walz have voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would require healthcare practitioners to provide care for infants born after failed abortion attempts. Their opposition to this act has raised concerns about their stance on protecting newborns who survive such procedures.
Tim Walz, as the governor of Minnesota, has signed executive orders and state bills that promote abortion access with no restrictions, including third-trimester abortions. His actions have sparked controversy and opposition from those who believe in protecting the sanctity of life, especially for infants who have survived abortion attempts.
The support for abortion with no restrictions, as shown by Harris and Walz, goes against the views of many Americans who oppose late-term abortions. Critics argue that these procedures are often elective and not based on medical necessity. The adoration for abortion without limits, even at the expense of protecting innocent lives, is deeply troubling to conservative commentators.
In conclusion, the unwavering support for unrestricted abortion by Kamala Harris and Tim Walz raises questions about their regard for the sanctity of life, especially regarding infants born alive after failed abortion attempts. Their advocacy for bills like the Women’s Health Protection Act and opposition to measures like the Born-Alive Act highlight a stark contrast in values between conservative and liberal perspectives on the issue of abortion.
