Staff Reports
The guardians of the judicial system have suddenly decided to emerge from their slumber, but only to scrutinize Donald Trump’s ambitious agenda. This begs the question: where were these so-called defenders of the law during Joe Biden’s administration, which can only be described as a chaotic free-for-all on immigration? Several federal judges have been quick to rain on Trump’s parade, stepping in to halt executive orders aimed at reversing the Biden-era policies that allowed millions of “new Americans” into the country, but their collective silence during the actual chaos hints at a disturbing partisanship.
Under the Biden administration, the border did not just become a revolving door; it transformed into a veritable welcome mat for illegal immigrants. Yet, the judges who now flex their legal muscles against Trump seemed to have taken a vacation from their responsibilities when policies under Biden were blatantly circumventing the law. The systemic undermining of immigration statutes was overlooked, leading to a transformational impact that will resonate for generations. It is perplexing why these judges suddenly care about enforcement when they had nothing to say while Biden’s administration ignored the rule of law.
One must wonder what sparked this newfound zeal for judicial activism. Were these judges operating under the significant influence of partisan motives? Trump’s decisions, though daring, are crafted within the bounds of law, leading to a string of legal pushbacks from those same judges who failed to act when laws were being flouted. Onlookers can’t help but notice the disparity in urgency between blocking Trump’s efforts to control illegal immigration and the stunning inaction during the Biden years when violations of U.S. Code § 1325 were daily occurrences. Could it be that these judges had a partisan blind spot?
Where Were These Guardians of Justice During the Biden Administration? https://t.co/sOVWc2VFFp
— Michael J. Fell (@MichaelJFell) March 26, 2025
As the Trump administration seeks to navigate the choppy waters of the legal system, it highlights a disconcerting trend: the judiciary, it appears, has been allowed to be weaponized against certain administrations while others are given a free pass. While there are now over 30 legal challenges blocking Trump’s executive orders, one can only ask: where was this legal fervor during Biden’s time in office? Transforming American society while ignoring the rule of law without facing judicial scrutiny raises serious questions about the integrity of the system.
Rather than standing as impartial arbiters, these judges seem to have taken sides, showcasing a clear example of selective enforcement. Now, as Trump faces the daunting challenge of overcoming legal barriers erected by the judiciary, it remains to be seen if he will exercise the tempting option of simply ignoring their rulings, much like Biden did with his infamous student debt forgiveness scheme. One thing remains clear: the current judicial landscape is more about political theater than true upholding of the law, leaving many patriots wondering if any judges will rise to the occasion and prioritize justice over personal biases.
In retrospect, this situation serves as a cautionary tale for the new administration and any future conservative leaders: the power of the judiciary can swing both ways. If judges can actively seek to obstruct a Republican agenda, then those on the right need to be prepared to counteract these tactics in the future. While some may advocate for maintaining the integrity of the judicial system, the ongoing precedent suggests that if one side plays hardball, the other must be equally prepared to do so. The question is: can the new administration muster the strength and wisdom to rise above this new norm?
