Staff Reports
As the holiday season unfolds, it seems there’s more than just wrapping paper and holiday cheer on the minds of many. The conversation around border security is heating up like a jingle bell on a fire pit. Recent discussions surrounding the Biden administration’s handling of border issues have led some members of the president’s cabinet to reflect on the past couple of years. With holiday spirit in one hand and a sharp critique in the other, they are admitting—albeit somewhat reluctantly—that they could have done more to address the influx of migrants entering the country.
The bustling chatter around this topic brings up the sensitive issue of “irresponsible politics,” which Secretary Mayorkas has been quick to point fingers at recently. It seems he thinks that the fault lies outside the White House, cleverly avoiding a strong look in the mirror. However, this line of thought is met with robust resistance from critics who argue that the current administration has been responsible for the messy situation at the border from day one. After all, when promises to secure the border were cast aside like a forgotten Christmas ornament, it’s clear that something has gone awry.
Retired Border Chief Chris Clem has lent his voice to this conversation, emphasizing that the foundations for today’s chaotic border crisis were laid when Biden stepped into office. With a wave of executive actions reversing Trump-era policies intended to maintain some semblance of order, it’s no wonder many see this administration as a catalyst for the current chaos. Clem insists that if Mayorkas wants to point fingers, he might need to take a closer look at his own actions and decisions.
As political tides begin to shift with a new administration on the horizon, those in law enforcement feel like kids with new toys on Christmas morning. The anticipation is palpable among Border Patrol agents who are eager to finally do their jobs without feeling hindered by the rules of the current administration. Chatter suggests that executive actions are primed and ready, just waiting for the go-ahead. This includes completing necessary border wall sections, providing advanced technology, and reinforcing the idea that the borders belong to the United States.
However, since words can only do so much, the real question is what tangible changes will come about once the gears start turning. Those entrenched in border security are watching closely for signs of change. Many predict that while there may still be an initial surge of migrants, expectations of a crackdown are likely causing a stir among human smugglers. What was once an open gate may soon be a sturdy door, making it much harder for cartels to profit from their nefarious activities.
Clem illustrates that the border has unfortunately turned into a playground for transnational criminal organizations during the past few years. The methods of smuggling have been barely impeded by governmental oversight, essentially making it easier for cartels. However, hope for a fresh administration offers a chance to regain control, leading to a secure border environment where agents can operate efficiently and focus on threats that truly pose a danger to national security.
In conclusion, as Christmas lights twinkle and carols fill the air, the metaphorical spotlight on border security reveals a story of mismanagement, unmet promises, and hope for improvement. If anticipated changes come to fruition, American citizens may finally breathe a sigh of relief, feeling safer in a country that appears to be reclaiming its edges. It’s a story of complexities, politics, and aspirations but perhaps, just perhaps, there’s a glimmer of hope hidden among the twinkling lights. Merry Christmas, indeed!
