Staff Reports
Donald Trump is no stranger to controversy, and now he finds himself knee-deep in a legal whirlwind that’s got the liberal elite shaking in their boots. The latest fracas comes from the Supreme Court, where the fate of his decision to fire Hampton Dellinger as head of the Office of Special Counsel is set to be decided. If that wasn’t enough, the legal challenges against Trump have been escalating, with the White House facing a staggering average of three new cases a day during the first month of his administration. Talk about a busy courtroom schedule!
First major challenge to Trump agenda heads to Supreme Court – Washington Times https://t.co/LUSGJvWH7A
— Janie Johnson – America is Exceptional (@jjauthor) February 19, 2025
The case involving Dellinger is particularly interesting as it could redefine the president’s firing powers in a way that would have the Founding Fathers cheering. Historically, thanks to a Supreme Court ruling from 1935, presidents have been limited in dismissing heads of “independent agencies.” But, hold onto your hats: experts like Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro believe that the Supreme Court may just flip this old rule on its head and bolster presidential authority. It seems that as Trump continues to bring the swamp to heel by dismissing thousands of government employees, including high-ranking bureaucrats and inspectors general, legal minds are sharpening their pencils to make history.
Adding fuel to the fire is Trump’s controversial stance on birthright citizenship. Various Democratic states, along with some immigrant rights groups, are scrambling to halt his attempts to curb this long-standing policy. They argue it infringes on the 14th Amendment, but this line of reasoning hasn’t done them any favors in lower courts. A case born from the activist city of Seattle is on the docket, heading to the notoriously left-leaning 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where judges seem more inclined to serve as guardians of the radical than defenders of the Constitution.
Trump’s executive orders also haven’t gone unnoticed. With a stroke of his pen, he has attempted to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion training in federal workplaces, reaffirmed the existence of only two biological genders, and banned transgender individuals from military service. Meanwhile, federal funds for certain “ideologically-driven” programs have been put on ice. All these moves have provoked a slew of legal pushback that leftist activists are eager to take to court.
As the Supreme Court gears up for these battles, eyes are on the justices who may turn the tide. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett may lean toward avoiding some contentious issues, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh has shown a track record of siding with presidential powers. If history is any guide, Kavanaugh could play a pivotal role in determining which of Trump’s challenges will see the light of day in the court.
While the liberal outrage continues unabated, it isn’t just another day at the office for Trump; it’s a veritable game of legal chess. The outcomes of these cases could very well forge a new path for presidential powers and redefine the legal landscape for years to come.
