Recent revelations about an alleged covert FBI operation targeting Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign have sent shockwaves through Washington. According to whistleblower disclosures, the operation, reportedly ordered by then-FBI Director James Comey, involved two female undercover agents acting as “honeypots” to infiltrate Trump’s campaign. These agents allegedly used romantic or personal connections to gather information, traveling with campaign staff and potentially compromising the integrity of the election process. If proven true, this off-the-books operation would mark a disturbing abuse of power within the FBI under the Obama administration.
The whistleblower claims that Comey personally directed the operation without creating official case files in FBI systems, effectively concealing it from oversight mechanisms like the Department of Justice Inspector General. This lack of documentation raises serious questions about accountability and transparency within the agency during that period. The operation reportedly ended after a major newspaper obtained a photograph of one of the undercover agents, prompting FBI officials to intervene and prevent its publication under pretenses. One agent was later transferred to the CIA, while another received a promotion within the FBI, further complicating efforts to investigate their involvement.
These allegations come amidst broader concerns about politicization within federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Newly appointed FBI Director Kash Patel has vowed to hold those responsible accountable and restore public trust in the bureau. Patel, along with Deputy Director Dan Bongino, is actively investigating these claims and searching for the agents involved. Conservatives view this as a critical step toward addressing what they see as institutional bias against Trump and his supporters during his first presidential campaign.
Adding fuel to the controversy are related allegations that FBI officials have been destroying evidence tied to high-profile cases, including internal operations against American citizens. Whistleblowers suggest that these actions are an attempt to obstruct ongoing investigations led by Patel and Bongino. If substantiated, such behavior would not only deepen the FBI’s credibility crisis but also expose systemic corruption within the agency.
This scandal underscores the urgent need for reform across intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Under new leadership, figures like Tulsi Gabbard, now Director of National Intelligence, are taking steps to depoliticize these institutions and restore professionalism. Gabbard recently dismissed over 100 intelligence officers for misconduct on government platforms, signaling a broader effort to clean house and rebuild trust in America’s national security apparatus. For conservatives, these actions represent a long-overdue reckoning with years of perceived overreach and partisanship within federal agencies. As investigations unfold, they may reveal just how deep these issues run—and whether meaningful accountability is finally within reach.