Staff Reports
In a recent episode of “The View,” Whoopi Goldberg and her gang of predictable sidekicks decided to go off on Tucker Carlson for his interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Of course, the left just couldn’t handle a journalist doing journalism, especially when it comes to Russia. Whoopi kicked off the tantrum by calling Putin “one of America’s biggest threats” and criticizing Carlson for not asking “aggressive, sharp questions” in the interview. Clearly, Whoopi didn’t get the memo from Putin himself, who called Carlson a “dangerous person.” But hey, who needs facts when you can just spew nonsense on a talk show?
WATCH: Whoopi Willfully Beclowns Herself: 'Tucker Putin' Would Be a 'Great Stripper Name'https://t.co/TbD9fnPBgT
— RedState (@RedState) February 15, 2024
Whoopi then added her own little twist to the discussion, suggesting that she should change her name to “Tucker Putin” because it would make a great stripper name. Really, Whoopi? Is this the level of intellectual discourse we can expect from “The View” these days? It’s nauseating as hell. But hey, I guess when you’ve run out of rational arguments, resorting to juvenile name-calling is the next logical step.
Not to be outdone, Ana Navaro decided to throw in some psychoanalysis, claiming that Putin’s preference for Biden was just reverse psychology. According to Navarro, Putin knows American psychology better than Americans themselves. Give me a break. The suggestion that Putin wants a president who can’t even remember which world leaders are alive is absurd. But when it comes to Trump, the left will twist any narrative to fit their agenda, no matter how nonsensical it may be.
And let’s not forget Sunny Hostin’s contribution to the chaos. She couldn’t resist bringing in Chris Wallace, who apparently called Tucker Carlson an “eager puppy” during his interview with Putin. Well, isn’t that clever? Not really. It’s just another example of the left’s inability to engage in meaningful debate without resorting to ad hominem attacks. Carlson may have his faults, but being intimidated by Putin is not one of them.
At the end of the day, the left’s meltdown over Tucker Carlson’s interview with Putin is just another example of their irrational bias and hypocrisy. They can’t stand it when someone challenges their narrative or dares to question the official liberal talking points. But hey, that’s why we need conservative journalists like Carlson who are willing to ask the tough questions and expose the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be for the left. So, kudos to Tucker for ruffling the left’s feathers and shining a light on their double standards.
