ABC’s decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show off the air “indefinitely” after his on-air monologue about the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has ignited a national firestorm. The network move came after major affiliates signaled they would preempt the program, and it marks one of the clearest examples yet of the media establishment eating its own when the backlash gets loud enough.
What many conservatives have suspected for years — that broadcast networks are no longer insulated from accountability — was underscored by pressure from the FCC and station owners who said Kimmel’s comments crossed a line. FCC Chair Brendan Carr publicly criticized Kimmel’s framing of the murder and suggested regulators were looking closely at network obligations, while Nexstar and other affiliates moved swiftly to block the show in their markets. The result was a corporate capitulation that didn’t look like spontaneous conscience so much as survival instincts kicking in.
President Trump didn’t mince words, calling the suspension long overdue and arguing that poor ratings and tasteless attacks explain why late-night cabals are finally facing consequences. His blunt take — that talent and accountability matter more than celebrity sanctimony — resonated with millions who have watched the same networks preach standards they never applied to their own. For conservatives tired of being lectured by elites, this felt like a rare, welcome bit of justice.
Not surprisingly, the usual suspects immediately cried censorship. Former President Barack Obama denounced the suspension as government coercion and warned that threatening regulatory action to silence critics is dangerous for free speech. But while the rhetoric of free expression warms liberal hearts, it often ignores the simple fact that speech has consequences, especially when it descends into tasteless exploitation of a violent crime.
Let’s be honest: Democrats and Hollywood have weaponized the shrine of “free speech” as a shield for a privileged class that is never held accountable. Obama’s indignation rings hollow to blue-collar Americans who’ve seen their own livelihoods destroyed by cancel culture and yet watched celebrities act as if their platforms are above reproach. If you’re going to bloviate about morals on a national stage, expect the backlash when you cross the line from satire to sanctimony.
Meanwhile, veteran firebrand Roseanne Barr is back in the mix reminding the country how raw and personal cancel culture can be. In recent interviews she’s doubled down on her claim that her 2018 tweet and its fallout were politically motivated and even suggested that Hollywood punished her because of her politics, insisting she was targeted for supporting the wrong candidate. Whether you admire her or not, her case is another example of how the media-industrial complex polices speech selectively and without consistent standards.
Hardworking Americans deserve a media landscape where accountability is even-handed and where consequences don’t come from partisan backroom deals or arbitrary virtue signaling. If networks want the privilege of broadcast licenses and national platforms, they must accept that audiences — and yes, regulators — will push back when the balance tips into hypocrisy. It’s time for everyday patriots to demand fairness and stop letting the elite define the boundaries of acceptable speech on terms that only serve their tribe.