Staff Reports
In the wake of yet another tragic shooting—this time at Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin—President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have launched another round of calls for more government intervention to tackle gun violence. It seems that every time chaos erupts, the first instinct of Democratic leaders is to push for penalties that disproportionately target law-abiding citizens rather than addressing the underlying issues contributing to such tragedies.
The unfortunate incident resulted in the deaths of three people, including the shooter, and left several others injured. Biden wasted no time in pleading for Congress to take immediate action, suggesting that legislation could somehow deter those determined to commit violence. His rhetoric echoed throughout the nation, invoking previous tragedies as if the mere repetition of their names could magically conjure change. While families in Madison are indeed grieving, it raises the question: when does the call for more government control begin to infringe on the rights of responsible gun owners?
🚨🚨#BREAKING | Biden calls on Congress to “act” after Madison , Wisconsin school sh**ting…
"Today, families in Madison, Wisconsin, are grieving the loss of those who were ki*led and wounded at Abundant Life Christian School. It's shocking and unconscionable. We need Congress… pic.twitter.com/RMxInYX2Ti
— RedPillPatriot (@_RP_Patriot1776) December 17, 2024
Harris chimed in with her thoughts too, leaning heavily on nostalgia from past school shootings to paint a grim picture of America’s classrooms. She mentioned Sandy Hook, a name now synonymous with heart-wrenching loss, but ironically, the more this administration lectures about gun control from the halls of Washington, the more they seem to ignore the reality that criminals do not care for laws. The focus should start shifting to mental health, community safety, and effective policing, rather than blanket bans that only hinder those who follow the law.
It is amusing, or perhaps tragic, depending on one’s mood, that Harris proudly touted the most significant gun safety legislation in nearly three decades, alongside the newly minted White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention. Instead of celebrating imaginary progress, perhaps examining why these measures have failed to stop the persistent violence would be a more productive use of energy. After all, as history has shown, stricter gun laws often leave the most vulnerable—like our school children—defenseless against those hell-bent on doing harm.
Adding more confusion to an already chaotic situation, reports emerged that the shooter in Madison was a 15-year-old girl who reportedly used a 9mm pistol during the attack. This fact alone opens up a can of worms regarding the effectiveness of current gun laws, given that both federal and state statutes already prohibit individuals under 18 from legally owning firearms. Clearly, the problem isn’t simply about access to guns but rather an urgent need to address societal issues that lead to such devastating actions.
The fervent call for universal background checks and an assault weapon ban speaks to an ideological drive rather than a practical solution. The reality is that potential criminals won’t be deterred by laws—they will find their weapons regardless of prohibitions. As leaders in Washington push their agenda, it’s increasingly clear that the true victims are often forgotten—protecting innocent lives must start where the actual problems lie, not by further encroaching upon the rights of responsible citizens.
