Staff Reports
President Joe Biden recently unveiled a proposal to reform the Supreme Court, stirring the pot in a post-judicial defeat world. It appears his party’s frustrations boil over as conservatives rack up wins, showcasing a Justice system that seems to favor Donald Trump. While Biden’s reform plans might get a distant nod from the far-left, the reality is they stand on shaky ground, needing a two-thirds vote in each house of Congress and the approval of three-quarters of state legislatures—something akin to winning the lottery.
In an effort to impose some term limits on the justices, enforce a binding code of conduct, and even eliminate presidential immunity, Biden is visibly grasping at straws. His proposals scream desperation from a party that has largely failed to shift the court’s conservative trajectory despite relentless efforts. Reviews indicate that his motivations might be less about maintaining the integrity of the judicial system and more about placating a cadre of liberal donors who have been pushing for sweeping reforms since the court’s conservative wins began to pile up.
Updated: Sore loser? Biden’s Supreme Court revamp follows defeats in big cases, favorable Trump rulings https://t.co/B6iAd8r8UQ
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) July 30, 2024
Biden’s op-ed in a prominent publication makes it abundantly clear that this proposal is directly linked to decisions that have frustrated the far-left. If the court hadn’t ruled in favor of Trump multiple times, it’s safe to say these reform discussions wouldn’t even be on the table. Legal experts have pointed out that Biden’s focus on cases he disagrees with reveals a clear agenda—if the verdicts were to favor his side, there wouldn’t be a whisper of reform.
While making a speech commemorating landmark civil rights legislation, Biden took the opportunity to unleash a tirade against the Supreme Court, labeling its recent decisions as extreme. The irony isn’t lost, especially when the president himself has a long history of having held onto his Senate seat for over three decades—now he suddenly wants to impose “limits” on justices? The hypocrisy practically oozes from what could easily be dubbed his “sour grapes” narrative.
Leonard Leo, a notable figure from the conservative Federalist Society, underscored how these reforms are mere cover for Democrats seeking to dismantle a court that dares to operate in alignment with a conservative doctrine they clearly detest. No surprise there—this is about silencing dissent and framing the court under the Democrats’ thumb rather than nurturing a balanced judiciary.
Additionally, the involvement of liberal mega-donors like George Soros adds an even more intriguing twist. His networks are funding organizations that echo Biden’s reform suggestions, diligently working to dilute the conservative majority that has suddenly become a thorn in their side. However, the majority of Americans who favor a fair and impartial judiciary may just respond to this liberal pushback with a hearty chuckle—watching as Democrats scramble to fix a court that has simply executed its constitutional duties. Time will tell if they can muster the needed political will to make these proposals a reality or if they will find themselves facing yet another disappointing defeat at the hands of a judicial system that operates as the Founding Fathers intended.
