The world’s environmental champions have descended upon Brazil for the 30th Annual Climate Summit, an event marked by grand speeches, earnest discussions, and—ironically—a carbon footprint most of us mere mortals couldn’t hope to accumulate if we tried for a lifetime. As thousands prepared to convene to discuss saving the planet, they managed to chop down over 100,000 trees in the Amazon Rainforest to construct a highway to the event. This, folks, is the kind of plot twist that makes reality richer than satire.
The summit gathered a crowd of 50,000 eager to trumpet the message of sustainability and environmental consciousness. Among the attendees were some of the world’s leading environmentalists, political figures, and influencers, all diligently advocating for the world to step up its efforts in combating climate change. But how did they arrive? Unfortunately, a significant number traded public transport for private jets, giving “fly-in fees” a new meaning—especially when those flying in are ones urging the rest to reduce their carbon emissions. Perhaps the only thing higher than their ideals is the altitude at which they prefer to travel.
Even more eyebrow-raising is that the construction of that four-lane highway in the Amazon, a location often referred to as ‘the lungs of the planet,’ was to ensure ease and comfort for their travels. This decision mirrors announcing an oil rig as a monument to clean energy. Is the aim to preserve nature, or is it to create convenience no matter the cost? One wonders if, during their discussions, they’ll consider replanting those 100,000 trees.
The heavily criticized summit isn’t devoid of star power, either. Among the ‘respected leaders’ adding to the summit’s prestige was California’s own Gavin Newsom. Known for his impassioned pleas for environmental reform, he seemed curiously comfortable attending a spectacle that cuts down forests for a road, providing fodder for those who argue that the conference was less about genuine concern for the environment and more about public relations.
Arguably, the spectacle of this summit paints a picture of enviro-politics at its most theatrical. As the event unfolds with an undercurrent of hypocrisy, attendees could consider reflecting on their own practices rather than just preaching. For those at home, the circus that is this Climate Summit serves as a reminder of the classic adage: “Do as I say, not as I do”, providing more evidence that in the realm of political theater, irony is alive and well.

