Staff Reports
In the topsy-turvy world of liberal politics, where self-destruction is inexplicably seen as a virtue, a narrative is being spun that former President Trump actually wants Zohran Mamdani to win in New York. That’s right, the suggestion is that Mamdani’s victory could somehow benefit Trump by showcasing the chaos stemming from radical policies. It’s a ridiculous notion filled with irony. Here’s why.
The very idea that letting a far-left candidate like Mamdani take the helm in New York would serve as a political strategy for conservatives is laughable. Sure, in theory, turning the city into a cautionary tale of failed socialist governance sounds appealing. But here’s the gut punch—it doesn’t work that way. Just look around at cities like Portland and San Francisco, where crime and disorder reign supreme. Despite evident chaos, voters continue to prop up the very people turning their cities into wastelands.
This is exactly what will end up happening in NYC if Mamdani gets in. It will spread and never be relinquished! #dearborn #michigan #Muslim #NYC pic.twitter.com/nXgGDEy5Rv
— Live From America TV (@LFATVUS) October 7, 2025
In this liberal narrative, Mamdani represents everything that’s gone wrong in New York. He’s inexperienced and full of radical ideas. Yet, he’s still leading in the polls. One has to wonder what is happening to the once-great state of New York. It’s becoming a sanctuary for disastrous policies, and still, the people applaud. The leftist propaganda machine is alive and well, evidently blinding voters to the harsh realities around them.
What’s truly heartbreaking is the collapse of a city that was once a beacon of hope, culture, and commerce. Under a dark cloud of liberal, anti-police, and pro-drug policies, New York is being smothered. Mamdani’s rise is a testament to how far the city has slipped. Clutching to ideology, New Yorkers seem unwilling to see the mess they’ve created.
Should Mamdani win, don’t expect some grand epiphany. The evidence of failure could flood the streets, and the voters still wouldn’t budge. They’ll keep reelecting the architects of their decline, chanting mantras of progress while the city crumbles around them. It’s madness dressed up as enlightenment. So will the voters learn from their mistakes, or continue the cycle of self-sabotage? Given history, the answer seems painfully clear.
