As President Trump weighs his options regarding military intervention in Iran, the world watches closely. The situation has grown increasingly tense, with protests erupting in Iran over not only human rights issues but also economic struggles and a currency on the verge of collapse. The killing of protestors was what President Trump referred to as a “red line” and he has suggested that Iran may be close to crossing that line. The Iranians seem to understand that this administration means business, unlike previous ones that perhaps took a more passive stance. The regime has even offered a paltry $7 a month to try and bribe protestors off the streets, a tactic as desperate as it sounds.
The backdrop to these protests is a country still recovering from years of economic mismanagement. It seems the Iranian leadership is feeling the heat, especially since they reached out to negotiate with President Trump over the weekend. Considering the punditry, however, there’s nothing to negotiate. The real issue is the regime’s deep-seated weakness and illegitimacy, not helped by their track record of doing everything except improving the living standards of their people. If the past 45 years under this leadership haven’t made that abundantly clear, then these recent events should.
Interestingly, what’s playing out in Iran is a parallel narrative unfolding in Cuba. There, the situation is eerily similar, with financial woes deepening since their days of Soviet support. President Trump’s recent post signaling a halt on oil and money going to Cuba unless they’re willing to make a deal adds another layer of pressure. The Cuban regime’s defiant response, invoking their sovereignty and readiness to fight to the last drop of blood, sounds more like an act of bravado than a practical plan for the future.
In both Iran and Cuba, the people yearn for modernization and a chance at a better life, much like their Middle Eastern and global neighbors. The grip of these longstanding regimes weakens in the face of people who know what opportunities could be available beyond their borders. For the U.S., this is an opportunity to show steadfastness by supporting those seeking freedom and prosperity.
While the situations in Iran and Cuba unfold, one wonders how long these regimes can sustain themselves under such pressure. Between Trump’s firm stance and the increased access to information for everyday citizens, it seems the clock is ticking. As regimes around the world reconsider their actions in light of potential U.S. responses, the effectiveness of deterrence becomes ever more apparent. It’ll be fascinating to see if these changes transpire, obviously hoping for a peaceful outcome for the protestors fighting for their rights.

