Staff Reports
Concerns about the safety of Trump’s upcoming inauguration have taken center stage, and if there’s anyone who knows the ins and outs of presidential security, it’s former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino. Bongino’s apprehensions about the preparations for this highly anticipated event are steeped in more than just speculation; they are grounded in a grim reality—government incompetence.
Even a cursory glance at the recent security briefings from the Secret Service and FBI reveals a troubling landscape. Bongino has become the voice of cautious skepticism, hinting that, based on his past experience, he isn’t betting any money on a secure inauguration day for Trump. His distant memories of guarding the likes of Barack Obama underscores that even the most renowned ceremonies can falter under the weight of bureaucratic bungling.
Trump May Not Be Safe at His Inauguration .. We’re all excited about Trump’s coming inauguration, but in light of the recent attempts on his life, it’s a fair question to ask if all the necessary safety precautions are being taken to ensure his safety. Former Secret Service agent…
— Papa Hemingway (@PopHemingway) January 16, 2025
Bongino’s fears circle back to the leadership of the Secret Service and the FBI. His faith in their capabilities is about as solid as a wet paper towel. Having witnessed the myriad of blunders these agencies have made regarding Trump, it’s no wonder Bongino is both concerned and vocal about the apparent lack of tactical planning. His expectation for transparency about security measures has gone largely unmet, and as the countdown to the inauguration ticks further along, Bongino’s unease only amplifies.
One of the truly disconcerting aspects of this entire affair is the FBI’s recent proclamation declaring there are no credible threats against the inauguration. For those watching closely, that statement sounds less like a reassurance and more like a red flag. Bongino has outright scoffed at this claim, as common sense dictates that ignoring the possibility of threats effectively invites chaos to the party. Given the FBI’s track record—particularly their blunders concerning Trump-related matters—no one would blame Bongino or anyone else for believing that the opposite of their statements might just be the truth.
Ultimately, if Bongino had his way, Trump would stick to the safety of his vehicle rather than risk an inauguration walk that could be fraught with danger. The lack of open communication from the agencies tasked with keeping Trump safe, combined with their history of mishandling critical situations, makes it increasingly difficult to place any trust in their assurances. As Bongino rightly points out, trusting the FBI on anything related to Trump is akin to taking candy from a stranger—common sense suggests it’s best avoided.
The decision to proceed with the traditional inauguration route amidst such uncertainty speaks volumes about the confidence—or lack thereof—surrounding security operations. As the day looms nearer, conservative Americans remain wary, holding their breath for an event they hope mirrors the safety and security enjoyed in previous inaugurations. In the current climate, anything less might just turn the page on a new chapter of chaos.
