Staff Reports
In the age of film reboots and sequels, it seems only fitting that America’s most beloved president, Ronald Reagan, has made a cinematic comeback. This summer saw the release of the first full-length film about his life, aptly titled “Reagan.” As it turns out, the documentary is not just captivating audiences on the silver screen; it’s flying off the shelves in Blu-ray and digital formats faster than one can say “trickle-down economics.” Many are crediting the film’s recent surge in sales to none other than Donald Trump, a name that looms large in discussions of today’s political landscape.
The film’s team has been vocal about their gratitude for Trump’s recent electoral victories, which they believe are rekindling interest in Reagan’s legacy. The correlation is somewhat amusing when one considers the similarities between the two political figures. Both Reagan and Trump stand firmly in a blue, red, and white world, championing America’s interests and promoting a tough-love approach to governance. Like a nostalgic trip down memory lane, “Reagan” paints a picture of a leader who, much like Trump, was willing to fight tooth and nail for what he believed was right for America.
Critics have aimed at the film, but as is often the case, their disdain appears to stem from their own partisan viewpoints. The film reportedly boasts a staggering 98% approval rating among viewers, while left-leaning critics have given it a decidedly underwhelming score. This seems to be a clear reflection of the ongoing political divide in the nation, much like the way both Trump’s and Reagan’s narratives have been shaped in the media. Who’d have figured that the challenges faced by these two titans would mirror each other so perfectly?
It’s worth recalling that Reagan was not always the dean of conservatism that he is remembered as today. His political journey evolved—he started as a bleeding-heart liberal before recognizing the perils of communism, eventually transforming into a staunch conservative. This evolution is undeniably reminiscent of how many in today’s political landscape grapple with the encroaching specter of progressivism. As one observer noted, today’s version of communism might not be the Soviet Union, but it takes root in modern arguments from the progressive left, igniting similar fears of ideological extremism.
The parallels don’t end there. The actor who portrayed a Soviet character in the film notes that attempts to demonize Reagan were strikingly similar to the media’s portrayal of Trump. Both leaders faced public scrutiny and elite disdain while remaining committed to an “America First” mantra. This populist appeal resonates today, inspiring voters who may feel overlooked by the so-called “out-of-touch” elite. And if Reagan’s strength came from unity with Congress, Trump’s relationship with the media plays a central role in how history will judge his presidency.
As “Reagan” finds its footing in the market, it’s clear that the film isn’t just about nostalgia. It’s about reaffirming values of patriotism, strength, and belief in the American people. Just as both Reagan and Trump faced their own trials, a new generation is starting to remember why these leaders stood out in turbulent times. Perhaps the return of Reagan in film form might ignite conversations on how to protect the ideals he championed, ensuring they remain alive and well for generations to come. In the end, the battle of ideas continues, and it appears that the spirit of Reagan—and subsequently Trump—is very much alive in the hearts and minds of many Americans today.
