Staff Reports
Since the early hours of election night, when Donald Trump was declared the victor of the 2024 presidential race, some media pundits have been scrambling to understand the shifting tides of public opinion, particularly among young men. Scott Jennings, appearing on CNN’s “NewsNight with Abby Phillip,” has put forth some sage advice for the Democrats and mainstream media about how they’ve managed to alienate a significant portion of the male population. Spoiler alert: it’s not a pretty picture.
Jennings has drawn attention to a critical crisis affecting young men in America—one that has left them increasingly disconnected from their families, communities, and the political landscape. The Democratic approach to this demographic seems to have been less about outreach and more about a dismissive “you’re part of the problem” mentality. There’s a clear disconnect here, as they continue to overlook the importance of male engagement in society, contributing to an ever-widening chasm between voters and their representatives.
Discussed why Democrats are totally in the wilderness when it comes to men last night on @cnn. pic.twitter.com/cyivwGCuH9
— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) November 20, 2024
As Jennings cheekily pointed out, in an attempt to revitalize their image among men, Democrats resorted to pairing Kamala Harris with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. This hilarious attempt at addressing masculinity issues came off more like an awkward school dance than a real remedy. The irony? Walz ended up being the last person men wanted to hear from, much less turn to for guidance. Rather than addressing genuine concerns, the Democrats floundered in what can only be described as pandering—a strategy that’s gone hilariously off-course.
The Democrats’ ill-fated foray into men’s fashion with their camouflaged Harris-Walz hats was another stroke of absurdity. Not only were these hats a blatant attempt to appeal to men who might be seen “in deer stands this fall,” but also an embarrassing testament to how out of touch they truly are. This misguided strategy was probably hatched in a brightly lit conference room by people who’ve likely never experienced the thrill of a crisp autumn morning in the woods, rifle in hand. Instead of fostering real relationships, this awkward window dressing only highlighted their lack of cultural insight and understanding.
Engagement with young men is particularly important in this election cycle, since Trump has made strides where Democrats have failed completely. Young men under 30 displayed a significant swing toward Trump—showing a clear R+10 advantage. It seems that when faced with the chaos of the cancel culture and the unceasing scrutiny by the left, young men are gravitating toward a figure they perceive as impervious to such nonsense. Jennings uncovers this fundamental shift by pointing out that, compared to Democrats, Trump represents a stark contrast: he encourages a no-nonsense approach to communication and a refreshing dismissal of the professional fainting spells that the left has become known for.
Democrats have effectively marginalized the importance of family, particularly the role of fathers, and the cultural ramifications of this stance cannot be ignored. Jennings points out that the rejection of strong familial structures on the left has left a void that many young men are beginning to actively notice. Male engagement isn’t just a political talking point; it’s a necessity for a balanced society. With the Democrats fumbling their efforts to connect with men, they risk solidifying opposition among a critical electorate in future elections. Instead of their usual tactics, a little humility and recognition of the value of traditional male roles might have served them better.
