Staff Reports
When it comes to Democrats and their endless war against anything Trump-related, nothing exemplifies their petty politics better than their stance on the proposed stablecoin legislation. Imagine opposing a bill just because it might have some connection to the Trump family. Instead of seeing the benefits of regulating the crypto market, many Democrats are blinded by their obsession with taking down Trump. It’s pathetic and a clear sign of just how unstable their so-called “resistance” has become.
This obsession has led to a major split within their party ranks. Some Democrats support the stablecoin bill because it introduces much-needed regulations and protections to an emerging industry. Yet, others can’t bear the thought of endorsing anything that might benefit Trump or his family, even at the risk of undermining consumer protections. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Where is the rationality? In a rare moment of clarity, some Democratic leaders recognize the bigger picture. They understand that focusing solely on anti-Trump rhetoric isn’t what’s best for the American people. But, of course, there are always those who would rather continue hurling baseless accusations, claiming that anything Trump touches automatically equates to corruption. It’s a broken record of the same anti-Trump hysteria that’s done nothing but divide their party.
Democrats Can't Rally Around One Major Trump Cause: 'Fissure in the Resistance' via @WestJournalism https://t.co/Xa56TQuIkJ
— Vicki (@gojeffie24) May 30, 2025
This is the pivotal moment where Democrats could have shown real leadership by embracing bipartisanship. Instead, they’re tangled in their own web of contradictions, showing once again that their obsession with hating Trump is more important than enacting policies that benefit Americans. The internal struggle reveals their fundamental weakness: an inability to prioritize the nation over their own vendettas.
What a sorry state of affairs it is when a political party can’t agree on a beneficial policy just because of who might profit from it. Maybe it’s time Democrats ask themselves: are they the party of progress, or merely the party of obstruction? Surely, this isn’t the legacy they want to leave behind. But knowing their track record, would anyone be surprised if they did?
