Staff Reports
In a rather unusual display, the Washington State Legislature kicked off its new session with a performance that left many scratching their heads. While most people imagine legislators discussing laws and policies, what unfolded was a colorful mix of dancing and drumming that seemed more like a festival than a formal political gathering. In classic Northwest fashion, participants donned masks, and one enthusiastic dancer twirled about, creating a scene that could have been mistaken for a college spring break party.
But the revelry took a turn toward the serious as the theme of the opening ceremony centered around the contentious notion of “stolen land.” This phrase, which tends to spark more debate than a Thanksgiving dinner with distant relatives, hearkens back to claims made about America’s colonial past. It’s a sentiment that fuels a lot of political posturing, particularly among those on the left. As the performance unfolded, the message was clear: attendees were being reminded of historical injustices tied to land ownership, stretching back over 400 years.
Now, it’s important to note that this message of guilt didn’t seem to resonate with everyone present. The idea that current generations should bear the burdens of historical events from centuries ago is a tough sell for many. After all, how many folks in the room could claim direct lineage to those involved in the initial land disputes? Most people likely had their focus on more pressing concerns—like getting back to the business of governing and handling state budgets, rather than grappling with the ghosts of ancestors long gone.
It’s interesting to think about how this narrative of “stolen land” isn’t limited to just one ethnicity or group. Throughout history, conquest has been a part of human existence, where dominion over land has changed hands like a game of musical chairs—sometimes with no chairs left for all. In essence, every corner of the globe has been touched by similar tales of acquisition and loss. This begs the question: why focus on guilt when the focus should arguably be on progress?
The setting was a peculiar reminder of how political spectacles can often feel detached from the practical needs of everyday citizens. While some may find meaning in reflecting on the past, many pragmatic Americans are just looking for a way to work hard, support their families, and ensure a better future. When it comes to discussions of history, perhaps it’s time for a little less guilt and a lot more focus on what can be done today to improve tomorrow. After all, life is already complex and challenging enough without the added weight of guilt for actions not taken in this lifetime. So, as the session kicks off in Washington, it could be beneficial to allow the past to be just that—the past—and focus on the here and now.
