Former FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, facing federal charges for allegedly lying to the FBI about President Joe Biden and his family’s dealings in Ukraine, is seeking to have his charges dropped. His legal team argues for dismissal based on a recent ruling that dismissed charges against Former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case, citing procedural grounds and the improper appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Informant Accused of Lying to FBI About Biden Family Corruption Seeks Charges Dismissed https://t.co/wBSZgcTw0x
— NahBabyNah #Trump (@NahBabyNah) July 16, 2024
Special Counsel David Weiss, who is heading investigations into Hunter Biden and related matters, is facing scrutiny following the dismissal ruling. The judge in Trump’s case found Smith’s appointment unconstitutional due to lack of Congressional oversight, a point that Smirnov’s legal team is using to argue for dropping his charges.
While experts suggest Smirnov’s chances may be slim compared to Trump’s case, they acknowledge the validity of the ruling in the former president’s favor. The key difference lies in the appointment process, with Weiss being a Senate-confirmed US attorney, unlike Smith.
Contrary to Smirnov’s plea, federal judges in various states have rejected challenges against Weiss and former special counsel Robert Mueller, adding another layer of complexity to the informant’s legal battle. With two felony charges hanging over him, Smirnov’s future remains uncertain as the legal drama unfolds.