Staff Reports
In recent times, there’s been a growing narrative that playing golf somehow reflects negative values. This claim goes so far as to label it as an almost fascist activity, but such a stance misses the mark entirely. Golf is not only a leisure activity but a longstanding tradition embedded in American culture that can teach valuable lessons in patience, discipline, and respect for rules—principals vital in any well-functioning society.
The criticism mainly revolves around golf courses’ environmental impact, particularly their use of land and water. However, this argument seems selectively applied. While it’s true that golf courses require maintenance, their environmental impact includes significant water usage and land occupation, sometimes by altering natural environments. For example, American golf courses occupy approximately 2,244,415 acres of land. These spaces often replace natural habitats rather than preserving them. Critics point to the extensive water usage, with courses using between 93,750 to 180,645 gallons of water per day, along with pesticide use that can pose health risks, such as increased Parkinson’s disease risk near courses.
Furthermore, some golf courses do offer green spaces in urban areas, providing environmental benefits and recreational areas for different communities. They contribute to local economies, creating jobs and attracting tourism. In urban settings, these spaces can still allow for interaction with nature, albeit with recognition of their environmental costs.
It’s also worth noting that golf fosters interpersonal connections, often serving as a platform for business discussions and personal bonding. Rather than dismiss these interactions, they should be celebrated as they can lead to opportunities and economic growth. The game demands personal responsibility, integrity, and strategic thought—qualities that align closely with traditional American values.
Ultimately, calling golf fascist is not only inaccurate but detracts from genuine discussions about environmental stewardship and cultural values. If there’s a need for more sustainable practices on golf courses, then that’s a conversation worth having—but it should not come at the cost of vilifying the sport or its participants. Divisive rhetoric does little to advance productive dialogue and often distracts from pragmatic solutions that benefit broader society.
