House Speaker Mike Johnson is raising eyebrows and ire over what seems like a monumental security fiasco at a Pennsylvania rally where an assailant aimed to take out former President Donald Trump. Calling it a glaring breach in security might even be an understatement.
Johnson has expressed his utter disbelief and irritation towards Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas regarding law enforcement’s apparent inaction and lack of basic security measures, such as the deployment of drones. It’s a given that any modern security detail includes drone surveillance, yet here we are scratching our heads over its absence. It’s like handing over the keys of your armored car to a valet and wondering why you got carjacked.
In a conversation that no doubt felt like pulling teeth, Johnson inquired of Mayorkas whether drones were in play during the rally in Butler County. The Secretary was seemingly clueless. The sheer lack of preparedness borders on negligence, especially when dealing with high-stakes situations involving the former president.
The incident escalated when a man named Thomas Matthew Crooks reportedly aimed a rifle at a Secret Service agent before turning his weapon on Trump. It’s astounding that rally attendees noticed this man crawling on a roof with a firearm and alerted authorities, yet it took a potential tragedy for action to be taken.
Washington Examiner: Johnson promises investigation into Secret Service Security breach at Trump rally https://t.co/hdkjg6bdAP
— Ian Hansen 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@IanHansenFeed) July 14, 2024
The Speaker has promised repercussions for this security debacle, which may involve heads rolling at several agencies. Mark words—Congress will be investigating this mess with a fine-toothed comb to find where the security apparatus failed. The only thing more predictable than government inefficiency is the rigorous scrutiny that will now unfold.
The million-dollar question remains: how did a guy with a rifle, perched A+ vantage point, elude a team supposedly trained to detect molehills turning into mountains? Bystanders could see it, but the professionals couldn’t. It calls to question the competency of those charged with protecting our leaders. More questions linger than answers, and it’s going to be one heated line of inquiry.