Staff Reports
In a recent event during the Annual Ashli Babbitt Freedom March in D.C., a conversation took place between journalist Jack Cashill and Hanna Rosin from The Atlantic magazine. Cashill expressed his belief in the importance of sharing the true story of the events of January 6. He highlighted the lack of awareness surrounding individuals like Ashli Babbitt and Rosanne Boyland, who tragically lost their lives that day.
Cashill pointed out how mainstream media outlets often neglect to cover stories that do not fit their narrative. He highlighted MSNBC’s failed attempt to investigate Rosanne Boyland’s death and the lack of attention given to her tragic passing. Cashill also shared details from his book, “Ashli: The Untold Story of the Women of January 6,” with Rosin, urging her to explore the facts beyond the official narrative.
What MSNBC Can Teach The Atlantic about January 6 – American Thinker https://t.co/VPiVlCij3R
— 🇺🇸Defund DC🇺🇸 (@Scoopier1987) June 1, 2024
The article discussed the challenges faced by those seeking to uncover the truth about January 6. It mentioned the resistance encountered by journalists like Ayman Mohyeldin from MSNBC in shedding light on the events leading to Rosanne Boyland’s death. The narrative presented in Cashill’s book and the efforts to reveal the untold stories of that day were emphasized as a crucial aspect of journalism.
The piece raised concerns about the lack of transparency in the reporting of Rosanne Boyland’s death and the subsequent investigations. It pointed out discrepancies in the official autopsy report and highlighted the struggles faced by Rosanne’s family in seeking justice for her. The article underscored the importance of independent journalism in uncovering the truth and holding those responsible accountable.
Overall, the article advocated for a more comprehensive and unbiased approach to reporting on significant events like January 6. It called on journalists to be courageous in pursuing the truth, even in the face of opposition or political pressure. By delving deeper into these stories, the piece suggested that a greater understanding of the events of January 6 could be achieved, ultimately leading to a more informed public discourse.
