Staff Reports
Kamala Harris appears to be dodging unscripted interviews like a contestant on a game show frantically trying to avoid the whammy. It is crystal clear to anyone who isn’t living in denial that she struggles to hold her own when placed under pressure. Her reluctance to engage in traditional press conferences reveals a troubling trend: she lacks both the competence and confidence needed to lead a country. Rather than face the music and answer tough questions, she’s chosen to hide behind edited segments and staged appearances.
In a striking 51-day span, Harris went from being the presumptive nominee to officially taking on the role, all while avoiding any real press interactions. Now, as she gears up for her most significant challenge yet—debating former President Trump—her campaign’s strategy of evasion is beginning to show serious cracks. The only interview she managed was a pre-taped event with CNN’s Dana Bash, where she made sure to bring her emotional support running mate along for comfort. This hardly qualifies as the substantial engagement voters expect from someone vying for the highest office in the land.
The chasm between her performances and expectations couldn’t be more staggering. As conservative commentator Tim Young aptly pointed out, a true leader should be able to respond to real questions from the press. Harris’s inability to handle unscripted scenarios puts her at a distinct disadvantage—not just in terms of debate but when interacting with foreign leaders who are undoubtedly paying attention to her lack of preparedness. The fact that her campaign seems to be minimizing her exposure to potentially embarrassing moments is a telling sign of their recognition of her inadequacies.
The reasoning behind avoiding unscripted press conferences is increasingly transparent. Harris’s team seems to adhere to a strategy that allows her to maintain a façade of accessibility, while, in reality, they’re shielding her from genuine scrutiny. The media’s willingness to play along with this charade empowers Harris’s “plexiglass basement” approach, where she can engage in pre-approved discussions without the risk of being challenged or exposed.
Kamala Harris is criticized for her unpreparedness and lack of engagement with the media, having avoided official press conferences as the Democratic presidential nominee for over 50 days. Her previous media appearances are described as staged and… https://t.co/D5mb0AGufr
— The America One News (@am1_news) September 10, 2024
Even with the election just around the corner, Harris continues to skate by largely unbothered, thanks in no small part to the legacy media. The mainstream outlets routinely give her a pass, aiding her quest to remain in the shadows while they peddle their narrative. Consequently, it’s no surprise that she retains a semblance of support even amidst her glaring shortcomings. There’s an undeniable truth in American politics: a significant portion of the electorate will pull the lever for a Democrat without discerning any real quality, making the prospect of accountability seem like a distant fantasy.
Ultimately, Harris’s campaign is reminiscent of a tortoise perched precariously on a fence post—an image that conjures thoughts of its unnatural presence and the inevitable fall. The parallels to her current political positioning are as clear as day: she doesn’t belong at the pinnacle of leadership and won’t stay there for long. The combination of media complicity and a base willing to overlook her failings may keep her afloat temporarily, but the truth is that genuine leadership requires more than just a party affiliation or a catchy slogan. The upcoming electoral season promises to be an unpredictable ride, and it remains doubtful that Kamala Harris will emerge as a capable contender.
