Staff Reports
It seems like the Democrats are really worked up about President Trump’s latest project: a grand new ballroom at the White House. Apparently, the concept of sprucing up the place is causing quite a stir. Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, notes that almost every president before Trump has made updates and changes to the White House. In fact, presidents have long complained about the lack of a large event space, with even President Obama having to resort to pricey tents for big events on the South Lawn. Yet, those same critics now seem to be peeved because Trump is addressing the space issue in his typical, grandiose style.
Trump is certainly living up to his reputation as the “Builder in Chief.” While others have merely lamented about the cramped event spaces of the East Room and State Dining Rooms, Trump is doing what he does best—constructing something monumental. The ballroom project is privately funded, meaning not a single taxpayer dollar is being spent. Yet, opponents still find ways to be upset. It seems that whether it’s private donations or hypothetical taxpayer funding, the critics just can’t seem to handle more progress being associated with Trump’s name.
However, there’s more fuel to the fire considering the current government shutdown. Critics have raised a fuss over the ballroom’s timing, crying foul over the optics during a time of halted government operations. Leavitt and the administration argue that the focus should be on reopening the government and urging Democrats to step up. The shutdown’s persistence is straining numerous Americans financially, and the President, according to the administration, is open to discussions on improving the health care system and other issues if the Democrats are willing to cooperate.
The previous administration’s approach to healthcare, as relations with “Big Pharma” indicate, is undergoing a transformation. The Trump administration is taking notable strides to lower healthcare costs and deliver on promises of reform, something critics might not eagerly acknowledge, but is essential to balance against the former system’s pitfalls. This intended overhaul shows the President is serious about making impactful changes, tackling the industry head-on to bring forward meaningful relief to Americans.
While the criticism flies back and forth, one thing is clear: the Trump administration takes pride in transparency and access. Reporters have more interaction with the President, and the administration consistently communicates its actions and decisions. In contrast with the previous administration’s apparent misinformation, these efforts for straightforwardness are marked as noteworthy. As tumultuous political tides continue to roll, the Trump administration seems firmly set on steering towards its vision, embracing controversies with determined stride.
