Staff Reports
In a stunning display of judicial overreach, a liberal judge in Washington D.C. has blatantly ignored a recent Supreme Court ruling that aimed to stop the leftist circus of nationwide injunctions. Just when Americans thought sanity might prevail, here comes yet another Obama-appointed judge to the rescue of globalist interests, blocking President Trump’s attempts to safeguard our borders and restrict illegal immigrants from exploiting our generosity.
Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling last week intended to curtail the rampant judicial abuse of universal injunctions, the same tired script unfolds once more. A district judge took it upon himself to stifle President Trump’s executive order that seeks to protect the integrity of our asylum system. The judge packed his ruling with every possible legal maneuver—nationwide injunctions, class-action certifications, and claims under the Administrative Procedures Act—to keep the border floodgates open all over again.
This reckless act fits perfectly into the Democrat playbook: block, obstruct, and defy. Their disdain for our elected president’s authority is clearer than ever. Judge Randolph Moss, equipped with every trick a liberal judiciary can muster, has twisted the law to fit an agenda more interested in appeasing worldwide interests than protecting American sovereignty. Not satisfied with President Trump’s lawful prerogative through statutory authority to control immigration, this judge has declared the authority doesn’t apply, imposing his own policy preferences over that of the executive branch.
Isn’t it interesting how quickly this scenario played out? It took less than a week for the liberals to exploit legal loopholes the Supreme Court left behind. This reveals how desperately they cling to ensuring anyone, anywhere in the world, gets a shot at exploiting America’s legal system.
This ruling illuminates the wider strategy of a globalist agenda that knows no borders. The judiciary seems to believe it holds the ultimate power over the nation’s policies, dismissing the decisions of a duly elected president. Aren’t courts supposed to interpret laws, not dictate national policy? It’s time Americans ask themselves who’s truly in charge. Is it the people, or is it unelected activists in robes?
