Staff Reports
In recent years, the American public has watched with a mixture of skepticism and concern as questions about President Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities have swirled. Throughout his term, many have wondered who was truly steering the ship if not Biden himself. The air of mystery thickens as reports surface about an alleged “shadow government” potentially pulling strings behind the scenes, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist from a political thriller novel.
Despite claims of a major revelation in a newly released book, titled “Original Sin” by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, there’s a palpable sense of déjà vu among Americans. For years, they’ve suspected a decline in the President’s cognitive faculties. The book offers little new insight, as it frustratingly refrains from exposing those supposedly responsible for any cover-up. Instead of shedding light, it grants anonymity to insiders, leaving readers in the dark, much like a magician who only hints at how the trick was done without revealing the secret.
The idea of five unknown individuals orchestrating a “shadow government” is intriguing, if not somewhat alarming. This scenario raises questions about the integrity of the democratic process. Shouldn’t the American electorate have the right to know who is piloting the most influential office in the world? Meanwhile, prominent Democrats appear to sidestep the situation, more intent on “moving forward” than addressing any past discrepancies. Such reluctance to hold themselves accountable tarnishes the party’s call for transparency and poses a potential national security risk, repeatedly swept under the rug.
During the 2020 presidential campaign, some observers claim Biden was elevated as a preferred candidate due to fears that Bernie Sanders would snag the nomination. In an orchestrated effort to present Biden as the amicable “Uncle Joe,” supposedly palatable to moderate voters, Democrats avoided deep dives into his health. Democrats avoided deep dives into his health concerns. No matter how the narrative is spun, it’s a hard sell to suggest that Biden’s cognitive decline was unknown to those around him, especially when it was so noticeable to the public.
Vice President Kamala Harris, placed directly at the heart of this drama, is alleged to have missed her cue to act decisively. As Biden showed signs of possible cognitive and physical decline, it was up to Harris, many believe, to address the elephant in the room. Yet, accusations of spinelessness and strategic inaction swirl around her. This inaction leads critics to wonder whether she was biding her time, hoping to smoothly transition into the presidency rather than rock the boat.
The ramifications of this alleged lack of accountability have been starkly showcased in significant moments such as the mishandled withdrawal from Afghanistan. Critics argue that such blunders highlight the dangers of unclear leadership. The loss of 13 service members serves as an unfortunate chapter that underscores the gravity of potentially having an absentee leader. Whether it was Biden or unnamed actors behind the scenes making the calls, the sad truth remains: the buck was supposed to stop with him, but responsibility seems as elusive as ever in this seemingly endless saga of political intrigue.
