Staff Reports
The New York Times seems to be at it again, frothing at the mouth over Donald Trump’s recent comments about Democrats, as if he just launched a verbal missile into their cozy little garden of establishment narratives. Anyone with a sense of reality knows it’s not “hyperbolic” to suggest that the Democrats have turned into a faction that would rather see Trump behind bars than in power. This is rich, coming from a party that has mastered the art of chaos like a seasoned conductor leading an orchestra of disorder.
When Trump describes Democrats as an “enemy from within,” it’s a wake-up call for anyone paying attention to the recent history of leftist tantrums. The party’s behavior over the past four years has been replete with threats, but of course, the so-called “journalists” at the Times conveniently act as if they’ve been struck dumb by these assertions. Instead, they twist Trump’s words into a feigned outrage fit for their melodramatic stage. After all, when a former president points out the rapid descent of civility in politics, it must be a sin worthy of a front-page smear.
NYT Smear Merchants Upset That Trump Thinks the Dems Trying to Jail Him Are Evil https://t.co/BmmWW2KDQA
— Axemuch Bastione M.S., B.S., A.S., A.A. (@AxemuchBastione) October 17, 2024
One amusing aspect of this kerfuffle is how the Times took issue with Trump suggesting that the National Guard might be necessary due to potential civil unrest on Election Day. In what world do these writers reside? They lack the foresight to consider that, given today’s climate, it isn’t just a possibility—it’s practically a guarantee that their side will hit the streets and break out the torches at the first hint of an unfavorable electoral outcome. “Peaceful protests,” anyone? That’s the code phrase for the organized chaos that the media desperately tries to paint as altruistic resistance.
The absurdity reaches new heights when the Times accuses Trump of inciting violence. They interpret his remarks as a sinister “suggestion” that the military could be unleashed on dissenters—like casual mentions of the weather. Let’s get one thing clear: Trump didn’t advocate for a military crackdown, but rather suggested that the National Guard has a role in maintaining order. The irony is rich considering that the Guard regularly helps deal with rioting, typically initiated by none other than the Democrats’ loyal base.
It’s also impossible to ignore the glaring hypocrisy in the Times’ criticism. They have shown no qualms about the true nature of this political climate, in which the Democrats seem intent on weaponizing everything from the FBI to the judicial system. Not long ago, pro-lifers at abortion clinics got their share of undue attention from federal agents, while criminals roam free as liberal policies destructively redefine justice. The mainstream media, in all its glory, glaringly omits these facts while trying to paint Trump as the villain of their melodrama.
As the old saying goes, when you lay down with dogs, you wake up with fleas. The fluttering feathers of the Times and their leftist allies merely highlight their fearful response to a leader who is unwilling to bend to their narrative. While they throw hissy fits over Trump’s comments, it becomes evident that the real evil lies in the political machinations of a party that prefers persecution to competition.
