Staff Reports
In the bustling streets of New York City, a drama is unfolding that could change the landscape of the city’s controversial sanctuary city policies. Robert Holden, a New York City Councilman, is channeling his inner superhero by advocating for new leadership at the border. He’s throwing his support behind Tom Homan as the new border czar, voicing concerns over illegal immigration and crime in a city that seems to be teetering on the edge of chaos.
Holden argues that keeping people who are in the country illegally, especially those who have committed crimes, simply doesn’t make sense. The councilman, who describes himself as a conservative Democrat, is making waves in a city dominated by liberal politics. His message is clear: immigrants who pose a threat to public safety should not be shielded by sanctuary laws. In his eyes, any local leader who protects illegal immigrants at the expense of safety should face serious consequences. It’s an audacious stance in a city where many seem to tiptoe around this hot-button issue.
As a councilman in a sanctuary city, Holden has witnessed firsthand the impact of these policies. Gangs, some hailing from various countries, have been wreaking havoc on the streets, emboldened by what they perceive as a lack of consequence for their actions. These groups aren’t just petty criminals; they are brazen and confrontational, feeling safe from deportation in a city designed to protect them. Holden is frustrated by this environment, expressing concern that the city’s commitment to sanctuary laws may be endangering lives—especially in the wake of the September 11 attacks, which adds weight to his call for reform.
In a surprising twist, Holden reveals that many of his fellow Democrats are hesitant to support him publicly. While some agree with his stance, they shy away from speaking out due to the dominant left-leaning political climate. This leaves Holden feeling like a lone wolf among a pack of sheep as he champions the need for action over party loyalty. He believes that the true allegiance of elected officials should be to the country rather than the party—a sentiment that appears to be dwindling in New York politics.
Compounding the issue is the bold declaration from Denver’s Mayor Mike Johnston, who has stated he would stand up to authorities in defense of illegal migrants. Johnston’s comments have sparked outrage, with some likening his defiance to historic protests like Tiananmen Square. Holden’s response to this bravado is blunt; if Johnston is willing to protect those who are breaking the law, he should be prepared to face the consequences. The stakes are high, and Holden is calling on leaders to join him in prioritizing community safety over political correctness.
As the situation continues to develop, city officials and citizens alike are left wondering: is it time for a reevaluation of sanctuary city policies? With voices like Robert Holden echoing through the halls of power, it is clear that the conversation is shifting. New York City stands at a crossroads, and the decisions made in the coming weeks could determine its safety and approach to immigration. The message from conservative voices is clear: it’s time for tougher measures and a reexamination of what it truly means to be a sanctuary city.
