Staff Reports
As the dust settled from CNN’s post-debate segment, the liberal commentator Van Jones was seen quivering in terror as Vivek Ramaswamy fearlessly tackled controversial topics during the Republican debate. Jones, known for his dramatic theatrics, expressed his concerns about Ramaswamy’s bold statements, claiming that the way in which he articulated his viewpoints was akin to spreading dangerous venom. In a melodramatic display, Jones even went as far as to compare Ramaswamy to a potential American demagogue, spewing what he described as “Nazi propaganda” and causing him to tremble in fear as he listened.
During the riveting debate, Ramaswamy drew attention by calling out the three candidates for what he perceived as a betrayal of the former President Donald Trump. He boldly proclaimed that the events of January 6th appeared to be an inside job and accused the government of deceiving the public regarding Saudi Arabia’s involvement in 9/11. Furthermore, he made a controversial statement regarding the Great Replacement theory, which many within the GOP view as a fringe idea not representative of mainstream Republican values. Ramaswamy’s unapologetic and unfiltered speech certainly ruffled some feathers in the liberal camp, leading to a flurry of reactions on social media.
CNN’s Van Jones says Vivek Ramaswamy makes him SHAKE in fear in hilarious clip.
"I was shaking listening to him talk because a lot of people don’t know, that is one step away from Nazi propaganda coming out of his mouth.”
During last night's debate, Ramaswamy said, "The Great… pic.twitter.com/cNnpTmv1q4
— TP Breaking Alerts (@tpbreaking) December 7, 2023
Following Ramaswamy’s bold performance, conservative voices on social media rejoiced in the discomfort of liberal pundits, mocking their perceived fragility and labeling them as “snowflakes.” Some even went as far as to sarcastically thank Ramaswamy for bringing about such comedic reactions from the left. The conservative camp seemed to relish in what they perceived as Ramaswamy “rocking the world” of the liberal establishment and reveled in disparaging remarks directed at Van Jones and other liberal figures.
The overall conservative reaction seemed to align with Ramaswamy’s statements, portraying liberal voices as overly sensitive and incapable of facing opposing viewpoints with composure. With the dust barely settled from the intense debate, the partisan divide was palpable as conservative pundits used the opportunity to not only praise Ramaswamy’s boldness but also to skewer their liberal counterparts for their perceived lack of resilience in the face of ideological opposition.
