Staff Reports
The public disclosure of the most recent explosive reports and documents has revealed an additional stratum of scandal surrounding the Russian collusion fabrication. Once-suspected notion that Putin wanted Trump to win the 2016 election has been disproven, with Russia now admitting that Hillary Clinton was the preferred candidate.
Here Are the Trump-Russia Docs the Intelligence Community Tried to Keep Hidden https://t.co/kjGFZCdyC6
— AvaArmstrong,??Author (@MsAvaArmstrong) February 16, 2024
Naturally, the liberal media propagated this false narrative, adding to the already raging controversy surrounding the alleged Kremlin interference in the 2016 presidential election. The intelligence community's unwavering resolve to depose Trump is evident, notwithstanding the presence of conflicting information. According to reports, former CIA Director John Brennan selectively selected analysts in order to manipulate intelligence and advance his Trump-Russia bias, thereby marginalizing the work of other agencies that did not support the CIA's primary Russia conclusion in a manner analogous to that of the Russian military.
The emergence of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) brought about significant media attention, smearing disorder into the impending Trump administration and portraying him as a puppet of Vladimir Putin. On the contrary, recent revelations have unveiled that the ICA was rife with embellishments and inaccuracies, whereby unreliable sources were elevated to reliable status to conform to the desired narrative. Critical voices, including those of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence Research, were marginalized in support of Brennan's narrative, which resulted in the overturning of dissent within the CIA.
Despite the ICA being validated by a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, substantial evidence suggests that the conclusion indicating Russia's support for Trump was manipulated. The book authored by former Director Brennan details his process of overturning the opinions of other intelligence officials who opposed his narrative. Even contradictory statements from the FBI and CIA regarding Russia's motivations contributed to public confusion and bolstered the notion that the narrative was being manipulated for political gain.
It has since come to light that the United States intelligence community initiated an illicit surveillance operation on Trump well in advance of the July 2016 start date of the FBI's official investigation. This endeavor entailed the collaboration of external intelligence organizations and the sanction of Gina Haspel, the former director of the CIA. In 2022, the FBI even conducted an investigation at Mar-a-Lago in an attempt to seize potentially incriminating documents.
Considering these disclosures, it is indisputable that a more comprehensive inquiry is warranted into these accusations. It may be some time before congressional investigators revisit this scandal, given the impending presidential election and the necessity for robust Republican majorities. As previous impeachments have demonstrated, narrow majorities may result in haphazard executions; the conservative community cannot afford for this to occur. This scandal exposes the naked corruption of the state and the extreme measures that some were prepared to take in order to destabilize an incumbent president. Accountability must be enforced for those accountable for this deception, as the American people are entitled to the truth.
