Staff Reports
In a fresh display of political theater, Senator Mike Lee of Utah found himself questioning the recollections of former Congresswoman Liz Cheney regarding the FBI’s involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot. Ironically, it seems that Cheney, who has positioned herself as a crusader for truth, may not have been in the loop on vital information about FBI informants present during the chaos. This speculation arose after the Justice Department’s Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, disclosed that a whopping 26 FBI assets were embedded in Washington, D.C., on that fateful day. Apparently, the truth is more puzzling than fiction when it comes to these Capitol events.
Lee highlighted the sheer peculiarity of Cheney’s dismissal of inquiries into possible government assets during the riot. Many conservative voices had raised concerns about the role the FBI might have played, only to be ridiculed by Cheney and her allies as “crazy” or “conspiracy theorists.” Pulling back the curtain on this curious case, Lee suggested that if Cheney had access to sensitive information on the January 6 investigation, it would be bizarre for her to publicly deride those asking what many considered legitimate questions.
Israeli PM Netanayahu says he had a “very friendly” call with Trump about the need for “victory” against Iran.
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/zrvdTdeWBJ
— AF Post (@AFpost) December 15, 2024
Even with the release of the new inspector general report, Cheney has continued her apparent campaign to discredit anyone questioning the official narrative. This raises a critical inquiry: did Cheney, who had privileged access to intelligence, simply ignore the signs pointing toward FBI involvement? If she possessed that knowledge, one must wonder why she resorted to name-calling rather than addressing the concerns head-on. Lee questioned her motives, ultimately suggesting that this reluctance to engage in an honest dialogue speaks volumes about her credibility.
As the plot thickened, speculation turned to whether Cheney might receive a preemptive pardon from President Joe Biden. Lee did not mince words here, though he admitted he wasn’t sure how that would play out. Given the disappearance of various pieces of evidence when Republicans took control of the House in 2023, it begs the question of whether Cheney and other members of the January 6 committee played a more nefarious role in what many are now calling a cover-up. Lee’s concerns highlight a bigger issue—a potential manipulation of political narratives involving pivotal evidence.
In a childish retort on social media, Cheney branded Lee a “nutball conspiracy theorist” for merely daring to suggest that the FBI could have been involved in any capacity during the Capitol riots. For Lee, this backlash adds fuel to the fire, as he maintains that the inspector general’s findings validate the questions he raised. In a somewhat cheeky gesture, he even threw down the gauntlet by suggesting he would graciously accept an apology from Cheney, should she decide to extend one.
As the drama continues to unfold, right-leaning observers can’t help but chuckle at the spectacle, all while pondering what other secrets may lie buried under the rubble of January 6. In a time when truth and accountability should reign supreme, it seems that those at the forefront of investigation might have more to hide than they are willing to admit.
