Staff Reports
Recently, the topic of immigration has been heating up across the nation. With self-deportations on the rise, it seems that many individuals who entered the country illegally are starting to realize that they can no longer rely on the court system to save them from their precarious situations. Meanwhile, in the Senate, an essential piece of legislation called the Save America Act is on the table, and it could have a significant impact on future elections in the United States.
The Save America Act is relatively straightforward. It only requires two things: proof of American citizenship in order to register to vote, and a valid photo ID to actually cast that vote. Most Americans agree that these are common-sense measures. However, it appears that the Democrats are not on board, as many believe that allowing voter fraud benefits their party. With the House already in favor of the act, the Senate now finds itself at a crossroads, contemplating the potential of amending or even eliminating the filibuster to push this vital legislation through.
One influential figure, who many believe to be advocating for this change, is Senator John Thune. There is a growing hope that he will lead the charge to ensure that only American citizens have the right to vote. The argument for the act is bolstered by the surprising support it receives across different demographics. Polling indicates that a substantial percentage of Americans, including a large portion of Black Americans, actually favors measures like voter ID. This makes it baffling why the bill has found itself mired in opposition from the left.
What’s particularly intriguing is the idea of a “zombie filibuster.” This term refers to a tactic that Democrats have been using that allows them to stall legislation without actively engaging in debate. The call here is for a return to the “old-fashioned” talking filibuster, where senators would need to stand on the floor and defend their positions with actual words. One could imagine a scenario straight out of a classic Jimmy Stewart film, where the urgency to uphold democracy boosts the resolve of those advocating for voter integrity.
The discussion around voter IDs also raises an important point about the irony of qualifications required for various activities in everyday life. After all, to get a driver’s license, board a plane, or even buy a beer, one must present an ID. What’s puzzling is that some argue that requiring a photo ID to vote is somehow discriminatory. The real question is: why should it be easier to partake in these other activities than it is to vote, a fundamental right of American citizens?
In the end, the fight for the Save America Act is about more than just enforcing voter integrity; it’s about ensuring that every legal vote carries its weight. Every illegal vote potentially cancels out a legal one, which undermines the very foundation of democracy. Ensuring that the voting process is secure and transparent is paramount if the time-honored principle of one person, one vote is to hold true. As this issue moves forward, all eyes will be on the Senate to see if they can muster the courage to secure one of the most essential rights of all—our right to vote.
