Staff Reports
President Trump has wisely decided to pull the plug on an unnecessary and wasteful Biden-era initiative, known as the Digital Equity Act. This program was set up to pour billions of taxpayer dollars into providing digital services to lower-income areas. The idea sounds nice, but it’s just another liberal ploy to waste money and grab power.
Let’s call this law what it really is: a divisive, government overreach disguised as helping the poor. If liberals were truly interested in helping communities thrive, they’d focus on policies that empower, not handouts that create dependency. Throwing money at digital services doesn’t bridge gaps; it widens them, by encouraging a reliance on government assistance. America thrives on hard work and innovation, not spoon-fed entitlements.
Trump to end spending on Biden-era digital equity law, calling it 'racist and illegal' – Washington Timeshttps://t.co/VLq2WFGJ39
— World Government Watchdog Jeff (@JeffJun80346519) May 11, 2025
Only a leader like Trump has the courage to call out this scam for what it is—a politically motivated waste of resources. The left seems to think that digital equity requires endless spending with no accountability. Instead of helping the nation move forward, their socialist tendencies just drive us closer to economic ruin. With the country facing more pressing issues, redirecting these funds is not only smart but necessary.
Of course, the liberals cry foul, labeling the move as supposedly racist and illegal. What’s truly racist, however, is assuming that certain groups cannot progress unless they are given advantages paid for by others’ hard work. Where’s the fairness in that? The American dream is built on equal opportunities, not equal outcomes. Hard work, determination, and entrepreneurship build businesses and communities—handouts do not.
In a time when fiscal responsibility is crucial, Trump’s stance is a breath of fresh air. The left needs to stop pretending that throwing money will fix everything. It’s time to invest in America’s true potential—its people, their grit, their spirit. Can liberals handle this kind of freedom, or do they thrive only amidst the chaos of their own making?
