Former President Donald Trump has once more dominated the news cycle by eclipsing one thousand fact-checked analyses on PolitiFact, the most of any individual in history. Unsurprisingly, the website with a left-leaning inclination has reacted in a predictable manner to this accomplishment. Since he descended the escalator at Trump Tower in 2015, they have allegedly been inundated with a "fire hose of claims" from the former president, whose disregard for facts is unparalleled.
https://twitter.com/Metz1245John/status/1758197913841181016?s=20
The fact checks have examined an extensive array of subjects, although Trump's election assertions have received the most scrutiny. Immigration, foreign policy, the economy, homeland security, crime, the coronavirus, candidate biographies, and healthcare have been scrutinized in close succession. Louis Jacobson, a senior correspondent at PolitiFact, noted in the report that Trump's "median fact check" fell into the "false" category, indicating a pattern of untruthful statements despite this broad range. This unequivocally demonstrates a propensity for deceit that is exceedingly uncommon, even among politicians.
In spite of PolitiFact's professed impartiality, transparency, and fairness, their approach to fact-checking exhibits a conspicuous double standard. The media's partiality is apparent in their coverage, as Trump is subjected to heightened scrutiny while Democrats, including President Biden, are exempt from criticism for absurd assertions like comparing Republicans to "Jim Crow 2.0" segregationists. In contrast, the claim made by the Homeland Security Secretary that "the border is secure" and the unsubstantiated allegations levied by MSNBC against Trump and the Republicans with regard to immigration policy do not undergo an equivalent degree of critical examination.
Evidently, the purported impartiality of PolitiFact's fact-checking is not entirely truthful. Conversely, they appear to have established themselves as the Democratic Party's stewards, selectively disseminating information that supports their own agenda while conveniently disregarding statements that contradict their narrative. The bias becomes further evident when Elon Musk's conjecture regarding Biden's border strategy is labeled "False" while other claims of equal skepticism go unchallenged.
A "Pants on Fire" classification was assigned to the website's one thousandth fact-check of Trump's remark that Democrats were "using COVID to cheat" in the 2020 election, further emphasizing the website's propensity to discredit and undermine the former president at every opportunity. This achievement illustrates how an overemphasis on fact-checking for Trump by PolitiFact exposes the organization's partisan biases and undermines its dedication to impartial and ethical journalism.

