Staff Reports
In a fascinating twist of political intrigue, former President Donald Trump decided to give a thumbs-up to Fox News anchor Bret Baier for his interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, dubbing it a stunning example of what happens when a skilled interviewer meets a representative of the current administration. Trump expressed his approval in a Truth Social post, calling Baier’s approach impressive, especially when facing a woman he claims is wallowing in “TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME.” Any lesser individual might have missed the sheer absurdity of a vice president being mostly concerned with a former president and the glorious economy he oversaw, but alas, here we are.
Baier’s sit-down with Harris was her first on Fox, making it ripe for analysis just days before the pivotal November elections. It was perhaps a daring choice on her part, but she plowed through topics like immigration and the economy, all while failing to escape the gravitational pull of Trump-induced drama, which seems to be the default setting for her public discourse. Instead of marketing her grand vision for America, she was trapped in the familiar role of attacking the man who has dominated the political scene before her. This begs the question: how does one build a political career in a vacuum of inspiration and continual reference to one’s predecessor?
Trump applauds Fox’s Bret Baier for Harris interviewhttps://t.co/BuAhiIuHrT pic.twitter.com/jgapeYlYQH
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) October 17, 2024
In true Trump fashion, the former president did not hold back, labeling Harris the “worst vice president in history”—a title that holds the weight of history, whether she intended to carry it or not. His critique underscored that the interview showcased her staggering incompetence. One must wonder how she manages to maintain a position of power when she can barely formulate a coherent answer to a direct question. For viewers, it accentuated the fear that she’s more adept at deflecting than governing.
Harris, in an attempt to regain the narrative, took the bait to criticize Trump, claiming he’s unfit for the presidency—something coming from a person trying to run the country while simultaneously failing a public interview. Her depiction of exhausted Americans surely struck a chord, though it does ring rather hollow given that she herself has overseen a debacle in leadership. The irony is rich: claiming to lead while wallowing in the grievances of her predecessors.
Naturally, Trump supporters were quick to dismiss the interview as a “train wreck.” With a colorful commentary to boot, Trump campaign spokesperson Karoline Leavitt made it clear that Harris dodged every topic with the finesse of a quarterback under pressure—except this time, the only thing on the line were her ability to convince the public she knows how to lead. If a sitting vice president falters in fair weather, she’ll surely be lost in a storm of real-life political challenges.
Ironically, amidst this feisty exchange, Trump shared mixed feelings about his own former home network. He previously opined that Fox News had “lost its way” by featuring guests from Harris’s camp, making his endorsement of Baier’s interview all the more conspicuous. The audacity of one-time allies now sparring reflects a broader narrative in which political allegiances shift like sand underfoot. As the nation gears up for the elections once again, one thing remains clear: rhetoric aside, clarity in policy seems to be sorely lacking on the left.
