Staff Reports
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who’s taken on the monumental task of co-chairing Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, found herself in a rather amusing predicament during a recent appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Attempting to defend Harris’ policy proposals, Whitmer seemed to tumble down one of those classic liberal rabbit holes that leaves most Americans scratching their heads in disbelief.
The disaster began promptly as host Kristen Welker pointed out the elephant in the room: President Biden’s approval ratings that are as low as a limbo contest in a kindergarten gym. In a twist of optimism that could only be described as delusional, Whitmer proclaimed that Biden would be hailed as one of the greatest presidents in modern history, asserting that Harris had played a pivotal role in this remarkable administration. This comes across as a bold claim, considering many Americans associate the current economic chaos and various crises more closely with the Biden-Harris duo than with any historical triumph.
When the topic turned to Harris’ enthusiasm for a ban on price gouging in the food industry, which aims to tackle inflation as if it were a pesky gnat rather than a serious economic concern, Whitmer dodged hard questions like a quarterback avoiding a sack. Instead of addressing whether the price gouging ban was a valid solution, she patted Harris on the back, suggesting that critics were simply misinterpreting the vice president’s grand vision. The notion that these ideas could solve inflation shows a commendable level of optimism but raises eyebrows about their viability in reality.
Harris campaign co-chair Gretchen Whitmer: Kamala Harris and Biden are "partners" in their failures pic.twitter.com/T8VATghEmQ
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 18, 2024
Whitmer proceeded to deliver a lengthy spiel about housing and healthcare, which might have surprised viewers more than anything else. The defense centered on the idea that Harris genuinely feels the struggles of the average American, as she proposes solutions that often sound more like fantasy than feasible policy. Although Whitmer claimed Harris focuses on ensuring people keep more money in their wallets, many observers are left wondering just how that can happen when government intervention tends to lead to more problems rather than solutions.
As the discussion meandered to Harris’ previous radical views, including support for single-payer healthcare and banning fracking, the governor’s laughter in response to criticism about Harris’ shifting ideologies was as natural as a high school drama club production. Whitmer dismissed critiques from Donald Trump about Harris’ inconsistencies, painting them as typical partisan attacks lacking substance. According to her, Trump’s alleged failures only emphasize why America should put its faith in Harris, a rationale that likely raised more eyebrows than applause.
In the end, even a political partisan like Whitmer seemed stuck in a tough spot. Defending Harris’ policies requires not only skill but also a well-resourced imagination, given the growing skepticism from both sides of the aisle. Perhaps this is why the Democrats have suggested that Harris keep her head down and avoid serious discussions about her policies until after the election. Those stances are a tough sell when most Americans can see through the flimsy assertions and recognize the potential for more harm than good.
