Staff Reports
A former Department of Justice official, Mary McCord, revealed her deep partisan biases during an interview with U.S. District Judge Tom Hogan, who has overseen several January 6 cases. McCord, known for her involvement in the Russian collusion investigation, admitted to seeking a surveillance warrant on a Trump campaign associate based on fabricated evidence. Her role in the highly partisan Trump impeachment in 2020 and the January 6 committee was also highlighted.
The interview between McCord and Hogan, conducted by veteran reporter Julie Kelly, shed light on Hogan’s false claim about Capitol Police officers being killed during the January 6 Capitol protests. In reality, the four individuals who died were supporters of former President Trump. Hogan expressed the challenge judges face in remaining impartial while presiding over numerous January 6 cases, citing the emotional impact of viewing police body camera footage and baselessly linking protester actions to police suicides.
WATCH: Federal Judge Casually Reveals It Is Impossible To Get A Fair Trial In Washington D.C.https://t.co/3L7SUIq0Gw
— 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA (@JDunlap1974) April 11, 2024
Kelly criticized Hogan and other D.C. District Court judges for imposing harsher sentences on January 6 defendants compared to Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters. Hogan was specifically called out for keeping a defendant in pretrial detention until being reversed by an appellate court, highlighting discrepancies in treatment between cases.
Over 1,400 individuals have been arrested in connection with the January 6 Capitol protests, with prosecutors aiming to bring more than 2,000 cases by 2026. Many defendants have received prison sentences for misdemeanor trespassing, a rarity outside of January 6 cases. Judge Tanya Chutkan, overseeing a January 6 case involving former President Trump, recently sentenced a first-time offender to nine months in federal prison, emphasizing the seriousness of the trespassing incident.
This article brings to light the biased nature of some officials involved in the January 6 cases and raises concerns about equal treatment under the law. The disproportionate sentencing of January 6 defendants compared to other rioters underscores the need for fairness and impartiality in the legal system, without political motivations clouding judgment.
