Kamala Harris has become a veritable political Piñata for the right, and it’s no surprise. The so-called “border czar” has been the subject of fierce mockery, especially when Trump’s former press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, flagged Harris’s catastrophic handling of border policies. The liberal media, of course, quickly jumped in to defend their golden girl, insisting that Biden never actually labeled her as the “border czar.” Instead, they claim that she was merely tasked with addressing the “root causes” of immigration. It’s a classic case of jargon masking a clear lack of action, because if Harris has shown one thing during her time in office, it’s that a high-profile job title doesn’t mean fulfilling any responsibilities.
The term “czar” in American politics has become a catch-all for those with noteworthy influence—even if those titles don’t come with any actual authority. The “drug czar,” “climate czar,” and now “border czar” have all emerged from the land of unofficial titles. Consider this the newest addition to the hall of ambiguous honorifics, with Kamala Harris taking up residence there. Claiming that she lacks the qualifications or authority to be dubbed a “czar” falls flat when it is widely recognized that she has been given a lofty role, albeit one she seems to avoid like a hot potato.
The media is claiming that Kamala Harris was NEVER Biden's border czar.
Unfortunately for the regime, we have 𝕏.
Here's the moment she got the title: pic.twitter.com/n78ovTOLA4
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 24, 2024
The New York Times and other media outlets were quick to state that Harris’s genuine responsibility lies in consolidating international economic efforts in Central America rather than addressing the tangible issues currently unfolding at the southern border. However, what’s interesting is how the “root causes” narrative is not aligned with the reality most Americans are facing—namely, a back-and-forth on whether anyone wants to stop the unprecedented flood of illegal immigration at all. Propagating the illusion that she is not responsible for the border crisis is almost laughable when one considers just how high the immigration numbers keep climbing.
While Harris and her fans in the media tout her so-called successes in drumming up international investment in countries like Guatemala and Honduras, anyone who has ever spent time at the DMV knows that economic progress can take generations to facilitate. A nifty PR move—promoting the idea that complex economic solutions will miraculously stem a crisis near our border—is essentially a political sleight of hand, allowing the administration to sidestep immediate accountability.
Harris not only inherited a tangled mess at the border but also skillfully sidesteps any real responsibility. With a format that entices liberal ideologues, she seems to be playing the long game. Her rhetoric about addressing the “root causes” sets her up to offer abstract results rather than concrete solutions. As her team scrambled to market an image of being proactive, the record-high numbers of illegal crossings continued to pile up like laundry on a college dorm floor—out of sight, out of mind game on full display.
Ultimately, Kamala Harris has settled into a role reminiscent of a rabbit in headlights, both aware of the impending chaos and seemingly reluctant to take the wheel. If she was looking for a way to deftly avoid heavy lifting, then she gets an A for effort. In the grand political carnival that Biden and Harris have orchestrated, it’s safe to say that calling her the “border czar” isn’t just clever wordplay; it’s a reminder that sometimes the best strategy is to say very little as the ship sinks.