Staff Reports
Let’s straighten the record, folks! The left’s gun knowledge seems to be stuck in quicksand, sinking deeper into confusion. They bark about guns with the wisdom of a goldfish! They need a reality check – it’s not the gun’s fault, but the culprit pulling the trigger. Case closed!
Justice Jackson's Comment About Bump Stocks Just May Be the Most Ignorant Thing You've Ever Heardhttps://t.co/nYRHflnFFS
— RedState (@RedState) February 28, 2024
Now, high up in the Supreme Court, you’d anticipate a sprinkle of gun know-how, right? Wrong! Brace yourselves for the baffling banter in the Garland v. Cargill bump stock ban case. Justices and government chatterboxes seemed lost in the gun-forest without a compass. How did they get there? Who knows!
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had us raising eyebrows before, with some surprisingly sharp queries. But her spark seemed to fizzle out faster than a wet matchstick this time around. She’d rather dodge defining a woman than admit her firearms fumble. She even outgunned the government’s exaggeration, claiming bump stocks can hit a whopping 800 shots per second – she should sign up for the Olympics!
The cherry on top? Her dismissive “whatever” made it clear she’s not sweating facts. How dreadfully comical, yet profoundly pitiful! Decisive choices demand a teaspoon of insight, don’t they? Shouldn’t the clueless steer clear of the cockpit? It’s like letting a cat navigate a spaceship – disastrous! Let’s hope they find their way out of the gun labyrinth before it’s too late!
