In the world of political theater, Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz seems to have reserved a front-row seat for special interests while leaving some important constituents standing out in the cold. Recently, a poignant plea from the Minnesota Catholic Conference was left unheard. This organization, representing the six dioceses of the state, had knocked on the governor’s door, petitioning for $50 million to bolster safety measures in nonpublic schools, including Jewish, Muslim, and Catholic institutions. But as the curtain rose on decision day, it appeared the governor was otherwise occupied and did not grant this wish.
The tragedy in Nashville sounded alarm bells, with a horrific incident starkly illustrating the dangers posed to so-called “soft targets” like schools and places of worship. After the Covenant School shooting, one might think that even the most hardened politician would recognize the urgent need for improved security. But when the time came to act, the governor seemed more inclined to pander to other political narratives rather than address what some see as an apparent bias against Catholic schools.
The elephant in the room, which the governor seems to have overlooked, or perhaps willfully ignored, is not just about security funding. It’s hard to ignore the apparent thumb on the scale that benefits certain groups—like public schools, which often have the warm embrace of teachers’ unions—over others. Meanwhile, nonpublic schools face the challenge of outperforming their union-backed counterparts with significantly fewer resources, an act that’s as surprising as finding out that water is wet. The governor might have believed he’d pulled a great vanishing act by sidetracking this funding request, but observers are starting to see through the smoke and mirrors.
The tragedy at hand is compounded by another societal issue that seems to be left on the back burner: the mental health crisis that affects individuals, often in the most profound ways. The Nashville shooter’s background reveals struggles with identity and transition, topics that deserve serious discussion yet often get swept under the rug amid the roar of competing political priorities. The narrative in Minnesota reflects this same oversight, showcasing a lack of initiative in tackling the underlying issues that could prevent such tragic events.
It’s essential to remember that beyond the headlines, real families are grappling with the aftermath of such tragedies, some mourning losses and others managing lifelong scars. As society watches and waits, one can only hope that those in positions of power will reclaim their senses and bring about meaningful change. Until then, the political play continues, with Minnesota caught in the act of transforming pressing concerns into mere footnotes on a broader agenda.

