Staff Reports
In the realm of broadcast journalism, it seems like some media outlets just never learn. CBS recently found itself in hot water after apparently chopping up an interview with Kristi Noem, and it seems they’ve been caught yet again trying to weave narratives out of thin air. You would think after previous controversies, they’d tread more carefully when it comes to editing content. Live interviews may not be a foolproof solution, but at least they shield us from some liberal editing magic that transforms normal conversation into manipulated tales resembling a cheap tabloid trick.
Critics have long noted that certain networks have a penchant for editing with a precision that’s more about crafting a biased storyline than sharing the truth. It’s as if some journalists have been taking lessons from filmmakers on how to spin a narrative rather than simply report the facts. And what’s the fallout been? Widespread skepticism from audiences who are constantly told one thing but see another with their own eyes. Noem’s situation is just the latest episode in this ongoing drama, and let’s just say, it is unlikely to win any awards for honesty in journalism.
Speaking of editing debacles, this isn’t the first rodeo for the likes of CBS. Remember the kerfuffle with Kamala Harris’ editing spree during the election? No lesson seemed to have been learned there either. It’s almost as if they’ve got so committed to a certain storyline that facts just get in the way. If you were hoping for old-fashioned journalism, full of integrity and impartiality, you might want to look elsewhere. In a world where selective editing is as commonplace as commercials, you have to wonder: Are we watching news or fiction?
And on matters of leadership and safety, can we talk about the tangible improvements in Washington D.C. after President Trump’s intervention? Even the city’s Mayor acknowledged cleaner streets and reduced crime. What a thought – the mere introduction of law and order actually yielding positive results! It’s a wonder why other cities, like Chicago, wouldn’t jump at the chance for similar support. You’d think the safety and happiness of residents would outrank political grudges. But no, it seems some leaders would rather stew in their distaste for Trump than take pragmatic steps for their constituents’ welfare.
In the end, this all circles back to a simple fact: Bias runs deep. Whether it’s in the editing room or the mayor’s office, some folks just can’t see beyond their political lenses. They miss out on the bigger picture, which, ironically, is smeared across every front page edited for effect. As different cities grapple with their unique challenges, maybe it’s time to put aside old enmities and focus on what truly benefits the people. It’s about cutting through the smoke and mirrors – and less about the artistry of making things look like they aren’t.
