Staff Reports
The Supreme Court has been busy with its decisions for the 2023 Term. In March, the Court issued six decisions covering various vital issues. One of the cases, Trump v. Anderson, involved former President Donald J. Trump and whether a state court could prevent him from appearing on the Colorado 2024 Presidential primary ballot. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump, emphasizing that it is Congress’s responsibility, not the States’, to enforce certain sections of the Constitution against federal officeholders.
It’s the only decision that makes sense! Trump stays on the ballot! Trump 2024
Supreme Court rules unanimously for Trump in Colorado ballot disqualification disputehttps://t.co/4pcujQFJCe
— Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷 (@Lisahudsonchow7) March 4, 2024
In another case, Pulsifer v. U.S., the Court dealt with a defendant seeking relief from a mandatory minimum sentence for drug-related offenses. The Court affirmed that to be eligible for relief; the defendant must meet specific criteria outlined in the law, including having a limited criminal history and no prior violent offenses.
Furthermore, in Lindke v. Freed, the Court considered whether a public official’s actions on social media could constitute state action. The Court emphasized the need to analyze the nature of social media posts and whether they invoke state authority when determining whether blocking comments violates the First Amendment.
The Court also addressed issues related to cancellation of removal in cases like Wilkinson v. Garland, where a noncitizen sought relief based on hardship to his U.S.-born child. The Court discussed the statutory criteria for such relief and the jurisdiction to review the decision.
Unanimous decision from the Supreme Court regarding Colorado ballot dispute. 👇 pic.twitter.com/kyp8F9QpgZ
— ♡ 𝓙𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓮 ♡🌿🌷🌿💋😘 (@jessies_now) March 4, 2024
In FBI v. Fikre, the Court ruled on a case involving challenges to placement on the No Fly List. The Court affirmed that the government must demonstrate that a case has been mooted by showing no reasonable expectation of the challenged conduct recurring.
Lastly, These cases highlight the Court’s role in interpreting the law and upholding constitutional principles. It’s essential to respect the separation of powers and ensure that individuals are treated relatively under the law.
