Staff Reports
The fallout from the recent security blunders at a rally for former President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, has only intensified as new details emerge. The Secret Service’s handling of the event has been described as a mind-boggling train wreck. Trump was grazed by gunfire, while a supporter, Corey Comperatore, was tragically killed, along with injuries to two other bystanders. Even the most ardent Democrats on the House Oversight Committee could not hide their frustration, leading to the resignation of Secret Service chief Kimberly Cheatle, who was left holding the bag for this incompetence.
New information coming to light reveals that local law enforcement had offered the Secret Service the use of drones for increased surveillance and security at the rally. Shockingly, these offers were declined. It raises serious questions about the preparedness of an agency that had been entrusted with the safety of a former president, especially considering the shooter, Thomas Crooks, was reportedly utilizing his own drone for the attack. Instead of protecting Trump—a man who draws massive crowds and obvious threats—the Secret Service appeared more concerned about resource allocation to Jill Biden’s dinner, which was inexplicably deemed more secure than a high-stakes Trump rally.
New Damaging Info on Security at Trump Butler Rally, Plus More on Possible Political Position of Shooter: RedState pic.twitter.com/Ix04RmlzOj
— Ian Hansen 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@IanHansenFeed) July 25, 2024
The discrepancy in resources is staggering. While Jill Biden enjoyed a security detail of a dozen officers, Trump was left with a mere three. This mismatch would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic. Given the threats Trump has faced over the years, one would think the Secret Service would prioritize his security, but it seems they found more pressing issues at a dinner event than the rally where thousands were present.
Further complicating the narrative is the emerging background of the shooter, whose motivations may not align with the narrative that some in the mainstream media are desperately trying to construct. The founder of Gab, Andrew Torba, revealed that law enforcement has been investigating a social media account linked to Crooks. Although the account had not been active since 2021, the majority of its posts were in support of President Biden. Some posts even backed his COVID lockdowns and border policies. This certainly doesn’t fit well with the claims that Crooks was politically aligned with Trump or the right-wing.
In light of this, the $15 donation Crooks reportedly made to a progressive cause through ActBlue raises additional eyebrows. Would this reveal challenge the left’s convenient narrative that has been pushing the idea that the shooter was a far-right extremist? The implications are significant, and the situation is still raising more questions than answers. It points to a troubling case of selective reporting when it comes to politically charged incidents.
The combination of poor security decisions and the reveal of the shooter’s political leanings could be a disaster for an already beleaguered Secret Service. This debacle will likely fuel further investigations and calls for accountability that the left will have a hard time deflecting. As the story unfolds, it continues to highlight both the failures within the security establishment and the desperate need for a more serious approach to the safety of political figures, especially those as high-profile and controversial as Donald Trump.
