Staff Reports
In a curious turn of events, The New York Times recently published a controversial piece discussing President Trump’s health and energy levels during his second term. It seems like the media is playing the same old tune, suggesting shorter days and signs of fatigue, which many believe is just another attempt to paint a negative picture of the president. The article, penned by Katie Rogers and Dylan Friedman, attempts to depict a man whose once-stalwart stamina is now in question, raising eyebrows and spurring conversations among political observers.
Trump has long made his energy and zest part of his political identity. Remember the numerous invigorating rallies? Those electric moments that packed stadiums with enthusiastic supporters? But the Times piece pointed out some alarming trends, such as Trump starting his scheduled events later in the day—12:08 p.m. on average, compared to 10:31 a.m. back in 2017. Along with this time shift, they claim that the number of Trump’s official appearances has taken a nosedive, reportedly dropping by 39%. Quite the jump in claims, right?
But of course, Trump wasn’t going to let this slide. He took to Truth Social to rebut the Times with the same fire and fervor his supporters have come to expect. In a lengthy tirade, he highlighted his own accomplishments and insisted that he has never worked harder in his life. He humorously suggested that he has more energy than opponents would like to admit—the “radical Left lunatics” included. His fans recall the time he bounced back dramatically after a harrowing assassination attempt, proving that his endurance might not just be a political tactic—perhaps it’s a feature of his character.
In a broader discussion about media narratives, the pundits on air noted the unique obsession that outlets like The New York Times have with consistently presenting Trump in a negative light. They remarked on how flimsy such articles really are, especially when they suggest something as critical as presidential health. It raises some eyebrows as to why they seem to have an endless supply of negative headlines. With over 90% of the press coverage against him, one has to wonder—are they just trying to sell papers? That seems to be the angle some critics are taking.
Far from what the detractors would have you believe, Trump’s schedule has been jam-packed since returning to the Oval Office. The man reportedly doesn’t sleep much, taking whirlwind international trips that would leave an average person gasping for breath. From negotiating historic peace deals in the Middle East to hosting dignitaries and attending countless events, Trump’s calendar has been nothing short of frenetic. CNN’s own Kaitlan Collins mentioned that younger staffers found it exhausting to keep up with the president’s demanding schedule. And while comparisons with President Biden are frequently made, highlighting Biden’s sporadic public appearances, it seems the narrative of Trump being an energetic force might not be as baseless as those headlines suggest.
As the media continues to spin narratives around Trump, supporters are left wondering when this cycle of sensationalism will end. Whether it’s exaggerated claims about fatigue or a lack of appearances, it appears that Trump has more than a few aces up his sleeve. His busy schedule and seemingly boundless energy challenge dominant narratives. So, while the newspapers may sell their headlines, the public is out there watching, waiting, and laughing at this age-old game of political chess. Isn’t it amusing how the game never seems to change?
