Understanding the Dangerous Psychology Behind Mass Movements

In a recent analysis by conservative writer Frederick Hink, the different types of individuals involved in mass movements were explored through the lens of Eric Hoffer’s work, “The True Believer.” Hoffer identified three main groups within these movements: the benefactors, the agitators, and the cannon fodder. The benefactors are described as politicians and community leaders who gain power through aggressive protests, while the agitators manipulate causes and people for recognition and power. The cannon fodder are easily influenced individuals who see social justice as a way to gain acceptance.

Hink goes on to discuss how some Hamas sympathizers interviewed displayed characteristics of these groupings. The agitators denied the atrocities committed by Hamas, attributing them to “Zionist propaganda,” while the cannon fodder seemed unaware of basic facts about the situation they were advocating for. This highlights the manipulation and ignorance present in some mass movements.

The article delves into studies on right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), with a focus on the dark personality traits that may fuel zealotry within these movements. Researchers have found correlations between LWA and traits like narcissism and psychopathy, indicating a potential lack of empathy and altruism among some participants.

Hink emphasizes the dangerous implications of these findings, particularly in movements like Hamas, BLM, and Antifa. He suggests that individuals high in neurotic narcissism may lack the empathy necessary for peaceful resolutions. The association between dark triad traits and aggression raises concerns about the motives driving some activists towards violent actions.

In conclusion, Hink warns against engaging with individuals in these movements who exhibit psychopathic tendencies, as they may lack the empathy needed for non-violent resolution. He advocates for isolating and, when necessary, incarcerating those whose actions become destructive. The analysis sheds light on the complexities of mass movements and the importance of understanding the psychological motivations behind them.

As a conservative commentator, Hink’s perspective underscores the need for vigilance in addressing extremism and violence within political movements. This analysis serves as a cautionary reminder of the potential dangers posed by individuals who lack empathy and conscience in their pursuits of social justice.

Written by Staff Reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stop Focusing on Biden’s Blunders and Hold Him Accountable for Policy and Actions

Even Liberals Admit Biden’s Open Borders a Serious Security Threat