Staff Reports
J.D. Vance is stepping into the spotlight, and it looks like CNN is throwing him into the same mud pit it often reserves for Donald Trump. As the former President’s chosen running mate, Vance recently had the dubious honor of being grilled by the relentless Steve Contorno. The topic? Trump’s colorful comments regarding Vice President Kamala Harris’ ever-shifting racial identity. Who would’ve guessed that CNN would stoop so low as to pull Vance’s family into the circus? But in true CNN fashion, nothing is sacred when it comes to trying to paint conservatives in a less-than-flattering light.
During an interview, Contorno probed Vance, whose wife is of Indian descent, about his feelings as a father of three biracial kids on Trump’s remarks suggesting that Harris suddenly identifies more with her Black heritage. One can only wonder if this question was intended to rattle Vance or if it was genuinely seeking insight. Whatever the motive, Vance kept his cool and didn’t let the baiting trip him up. His response was clear: Trump’s observations about Harris’ inconsistencies are valid. After all, she has mastered the art of political chameleonic behavior, blending into whichever crowd seems most favorable at the moment.
Watch: JD Vance Expertly Shuts Down CNN Reporter's Race-Baiting Attempt via @WestJournalism https://t.co/P71kdPM9lc
— Louisiana Patriot (@libbamcenery) August 2, 2024
In addition to deftly skirting the race-baiting trap, Vance turned the conversation back to the facts. He pointed out that Harris flaunted her Indian heritage when it served her purpose but now seems to exclusively lean on her African-American background. This transformation reeks of opportunism—something that should concern anyone who cares about honesty, integrity, and transparency in leadership. Vance even likened her behavior to a desperate attempt to pander to whatever voting block she thinks might benefit her chances.
Vance certainly didn’t stop there. He laid out Harris’ spotty track record when it comes to crime and police support, pointing out her double speak on issues like open borders and police funding. One might expect him to soften the critique, but instead, Vance tackled it head-on. The contrast between her tough-on-crime persona and her prior calls to defund the police paints a chaotic picture filled with contradictions that perfectly encapsulates Harris’ political existence.
This entire episode shines a light on the heart of the matter: Harris seems trapped in a perpetual identity crisis, flailing to maintain any real principles or beliefs that would help guide her decisions. Instead, she curates her identity based on the latest polls and public sentiments—a strategy that may work in political circles but offers little in terms of genuine governance. Vance recognizes this, as do many other conservatives who are all too aware of Harris’ penchant for opportunism. As the election season ramps up, one thing is certain: voters need to see through the smoke and mirrors to truly understand what’s at stake.
