Staff Reports
Colombians are heading to the polls this Sunday to pick a new president. After President Gustavo Petro’s single term, the country faces a clear choice: stick with the same theory that led to half-finished peace efforts and a rising crime wave, or pick leaders who put security and law back at the top of the list. This election is shaping up to be a referendum on whether soft policies or tougher action will restore order.
Why security is the central issue in the Colombia presidential election
The 2016 peace deal with the FARC promised a new chapter for Colombia. Ten years on, many voters see the promise as unkept. Armed groups and organized crime have resurfaced in parts of the country. Critics say the current government under President Gustavo Petro has not stopped the violence. Supporters say social programs are needed to fix the root causes. Voters want results, and that is why security has moved from a policy debate to the deciding issue at the ballot box.
Where the main candidates stand — in plain terms
On the right, Conservative senator Paloma Valencia argues for a tougher security plan and a return to the hardline approach of former President Álvaro Uribe. That message appeals to Colombians tired of fear and extortion. Business-friendly populist Abelardo de la Espriella is selling tax cuts and a hard crack-down on criminal networks, aiming for both voters and investors. On the left, Senator Iván Cepeda promises to preserve President Petro’s peace agenda and keep talking with armed factions. Moderate Sergio Fajardo pitches education and gradual reform. These are the choices: talk more, or try to restore order now.
Political violence is a warning sign — and voters have noticed
Campaign violence has already darkened this race. The killing of presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe Turbay at a rally shocked the nation and reminded voters that Colombia’s peace is fragile. When candidates and rallies become targets, people stop debating policies and start worrying about safety. That fear favors candidates who make strong security promises rather than more experimental social programs.
For voters and for observers abroad, the message is simple: the peace deal cannot be a cover for lawlessness. Colombia deserves both justice and development, but justice without security becomes a hollow slogan. If leaders can’t keep citizens safe, no amount of social spending will change daily life for families under threat.
As Colombians vote this Sunday, they will weigh promises against results. The next president will inherit a country that wants peace, but also wants the rule of law enforced. Whichever way the pendulum swings, this election will send a clear signal about whether Colombia chooses stricter security and order, or a continued bet on talks and social investment without tougher enforcement. That choice will shape the country for years to come.
