Staff Reports
In the news recently, the International Longshoreman’s Association went on strike, causing concerns for the nation’s economy and its people. This strike comes after a previous supply chain crisis in 2020 that had long-lasting economic effects. The union, led by Harold Daggett, is demanding a significant pay raise and resisting new technology in fear of potential job loss. This strike is estimated to cost the nation billions of dollars each day and could worsen the ongoing inflation issue.
From a conservative perspective, this strike highlights the negative impact of collectivist demands on the broader population. While unions may claim to support working-class individuals, their actions can ultimately harm all Americans. The high salary demands of the longshoremen, who already earn well above the national average, could lead to increased prices for consumers and shortages of essential goods.
Who Wins When the Longshoremen Go on Strike? – American Thinker #Marxism https://t.co/23knezbMBm
— Terri 🏴 (@River_City) October 2, 2024
The lack of intervention from President Biden in this strike raises concerns about national security and leadership. By allowing the strike to proceed without taking action, the administration risks further economic strain on the country. The focus on collective bargaining over the well-being of the nation reflects a concerning prioritization of special interests over the greater good.
In the face of this strike, it may be necessary for the United States Maritime Alliance to consider alternative options, such as replacing striking workers to ensure the continued flow of essential goods. By prioritizing the needs of all Americans and preventing the undue influence of special interest groups, the nation can avoid a potential crisis manufactured by the actions of a few individuals.
