in

Netanyahu Wants to End $3.8B US Military Aid Over 10 Years

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told CBS News’ 60 Minutes that he wants to “draw down to zero” the U.S. financial component of military aid to Israel and to start that process now, over what he said could be about a decade. It is a clear, fast-moving development with big implications for Washington and Jerusalem — and a welcome reminder that allies should be partners, not dependents.

Netanyahu’s Big Announcement

On the interview, Mr. Netanyahu said he has already raised the idea with President Trump and wants to begin weaning Israel off roughly $3.8 billion a year in U.S. military aid. He said the plan could move fast, but that a gradual ten‑year timeline would work. The words were simple, but the message was loud: Israel should pay more of its own defense bill and act with greater independence.

What this really means for the U.S.–Israel alliance

There are legal and budget rules that matter. The current 10‑year Memorandum of Understanding sets the $3.8 billion baseline and Congress controls appropriations. So Israel cannot unilaterally end those payments; U.S. lawmakers and the White House must act. On the technical side, U.S. aid funds joint programs, F‑35 deals, and co‑production lines. Replacing that money will require planning from Israel’s defense and finance ministries so supply chains and joint projects don’t break.

Political and strategic fallout

Conservatives should like the idea of an able ally standing on its own feet. Self‑reliance is a better long‑term basis for a partnership than permanent subsidies. At the same time, the shift would reduce U.S. leverage over Israeli choices. Some Republicans, including key lawmakers, have already signaled they could back accelerating a wind‑down and redirect funds to American defense needs. Progressives who pushed for cutting aid as a cudgel against Israeli policy will be cheering; that’s predictable. But policy should be driven by strategy and reality, not political theater. If Israel wants this, it must come with a real budget and industrial plan — not just TV interviews and applause lines.

Bottom line

Netanyahu’s statement on 60 Minutes is bold and politically shrewd. It puts the ball in Washington’s court and forces a serious debate: keep the status quo, or manage a planned handoff toward Israeli self‑funding while protecting vital defense cooperation. Conservatives who care about strong alliances should welcome tougher partners, not weaker dependents. If this idea moves from words to a well‑scoped plan, it could strengthen both Israel’s independence and the long‑term strategic relationship with the United States — assuming both sides do the hard work required and skip the usual Washington drama along the way.

Written by Staff Reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rasmussen Poll: Voter Trust Plummets After Venezuelan Whistleblower

Rasmussen Poll: Voter Trust Plummets After Venezuelan Whistleblower

Defense Seeks to Remove DOJ Leaders Who Attended Trump WHCA Dinner

Defense Seeks to Remove DOJ Leaders Who Attended Trump WHCA Dinner